Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

It is widely believed that access to clean water should be financially and ethically obligated by the government to provide basic life supplies for maintaining human lives and human rights.

In my opinion, I completely agree with this view because clean water shouldn’t be a burden for people’s households and for people who live with poverty, they wouldn’t be able to afford this basic life necessity and couldn’t stabilize their health.

First and foremost, clean water is absolutely indispensable for sustaining bodily function. Without it, individuals would be unable to survive and keep themselves healthy. For instance, people usually need water to prepare their meals and they usually need to consume clean water up to 2 liter per day for sustaining their well-being. Therefore, clean water should be provided by the state and not be financial burden on individuals across the country. Furthermore, individuals living in poverty are particularly vulnerable to water insecurity. Without free access to clean water, low-income households may be forced to consume contaminated water, leading to severe infections and waterborne diseases, for instance, such as diarrhea, giardiasis and other severe illnesses caused by pathogenic living organisms. Therefore, governments should treat clean water as public welfare services rather than social burdensome.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that clean water should be freely provided because clean water is essential for sustaining people’s life and some households with low-income are lack of clean water for consuming leading to risky severe diseases. Government must therefore treat water as a public welfare services to ensure equal access to all of the citizens.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The response addresses the prompt clearly and maintains a consistent position throughout. You have provided relevant arguments regarding health and poverty to support your stance. The ideas are generally well-developed, though the explanation could be further extended by considering potential counter-arguments or the economic feasibility of such a policy to reach a higher band. The introduction and conclusion clearly state your opinion, ensuring the reader understands your perspective from the outset. To improve, ensure that every point is fully explored with specific examples or deeper analysis rather than just stating the necessity of water.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and you use cohesive devices such as 'First and foremost', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion' to guide the reader. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical, and the referencing could be more sophisticated. For example, the sentence 'some households with low-income are lack of clean water for consuming leading to risky severe diseases' is a bit clunky and could be better linked to the previous arguments. Overall, the paragraphing is appropriate and supports the flow of the argument effectively.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, including terms like 'indispensable', 'vulnerable', 'water insecurity', and 'pathogenic'. There are some minor errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'financially and ethically obligated by the government' (which is slightly awkward) and 'social burdensome' (should be 'social burden'). While you attempt to use less common vocabulary, these occasional inaccuracies prevent a higher score. Focusing on more natural collocations and ensuring that adjectives and nouns are used in their correct forms will help you achieve a higher band in this criterion.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is good. However, there are several grammatical errors that occur throughout the text. For instance, 'are lack of clean water' should be 'lack clean water', and '2 liter' should be '2 liters'. Additionally, the phrase 'clean water shouldn’t be a burden for people’s households and for people who live with poverty' is a run-on sentence that could be punctuated more effectively. While these errors do not impede communication, they are frequent enough to prevent a higher score. Aim for more precision in subject-verb agreement and pluralization.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.