Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-07-28
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 7.0)
Access to clean water is a fundamental human right because it is essential for health and survival. I strongly agree that every household should receive a basic supply of clean water free of charge, although excess consumption could reasonably be charged.
Firstly, clean water is necessary for daily life and maintaining public health. People need clean water for drinking, cooking and personal hygiene. If families cannot afford it, they may be forced to use contaminated water, increasing the spread off waterborne diseases and placing additional pressure on healthcare system. Providing every household with a basic amount of free water would help improve public health and reduce social inequality. This also helps in maintaining public health by giving them fresh water to use.
Secondly, access to free water promotes fairness and social welfare. Governments have a responsibility to ensure that citizens can meet their basic needs, especially low-income families, older people and disabilities. These people often need support for their survival by administrations by providing them basic needs for free of charge, help them to live peacefully in the world However it does not mean that unlimited water should be free. Charging for excessive use encourages water conservation and helps protect this valuable natural resource.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that every household should receive a basic supply of pure water without any charge because it is essential for life and public health. Nevertheless, charging for water used beyond basic needs is a practical way to prevent waste and ensure sustainable use.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 7.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Overall | 7.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5
The response addresses all parts of the prompt, clearly stating a position in the introduction and maintaining it throughout. The argument is well-structured, balancing the right to free water with the practical necessity of charging for excess usage. Ideas are relevant and extended, such as the mention of public health and social welfare. While the development is logical, some points could be further supported with more specific examples or deeper analysis to reach the highest bands. However, the response effectively answers the prompt and provides a clear, consistent argument.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'Firstly', 'Secondly', and 'In conclusion' are used to guide the reader through the argument. However, there are some minor issues with flow and referencing, such as the slightly awkward transition in the second paragraph: 'These people often need support for their survival by administrations by providing them basic needs for free of charge'. Despite these minor mechanical issues, the progression of ideas remains clear and easy to follow.
Lexical Resource — Band 7.0
The vocabulary is generally appropriate and sufficient for the task. The student uses relevant terms such as 'fundamental human right', 'contaminated water', 'waterborne diseases', and 'sustainable use'. There are some minor inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'disabilities' used as a noun to refer to people (should be 'people with disabilities') and 'spread off' (should be 'spread of'). These errors do not impede communication, and the range is adequate to express complex ideas clearly.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5
The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, particularly with prepositions and sentence construction, such as 'support for their survival by administrations by providing them basic needs for free of charge'. Additionally, there is a missing punctuation mark in 'world However'. While these errors are noticeable, they do not significantly hinder the reader's understanding. The student shows an ability to use complex structures, but greater control over sentence construction and punctuation would improve the accuracy of the writing.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.