Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It if often argued that clean water facility is a minimal human right. Moreover, each and every house should have a clean water supply in free of charge. Water plays vital role in daily activities in human’s life as well as animals and plants.

Access to clean and pure water in every home is basic human rights. Water plays pivotal role in human’s daily activities. We as a human being need water supply in every household chores. Similarly plant needs supply of water in order to grow as well as for photosynthesis process. Moreover, animals also need water to sustain livelihood. For example, plant use water in food making process, animals need water to hydrate and human use water in cooking,drinking,cleaning, washing clothes, shower and various other reasons.

Pure and clean water is essentials in terms of of keeping safe from harmful diseases which people easily acquired from water-borne diseases. Supply of clean water facility should be free of cost in every house in a society and community. Moreover, poor individuals can not offer the cost of water every time. They are forced to used unfiltered water which can lead to disease and distress in economy of the community. For instance, survey done in rural community, people were unaware of disease caused by unfilter water and most of people found sick.

In the contrast, Clean, pure and filter water is the basic human needs and right. Moreover, the supply of water should be free of cost and provided to every home in the country. Since this healthy approach alone can save thousands of people suffering different diseases. Moreover, water help plants to grow and this boost geenery and economy of the community.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position that water should be a free human right. However, the development of ideas is somewhat repetitive. The argument focuses heavily on the necessity of water for survival, which is already established in the prompt, rather than exploring the economic or logistical implications of providing it free of charge. While the points about public health and poverty are relevant, they are not fully extended. The essay would benefit from a more nuanced discussion regarding the feasibility of universal free supply versus targeted subsidies for the poor, which would demonstrate a higher level of critical thinking.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical progression is hindered by repetitive phrasing and a lack of sophisticated linking. While cohesive devices like 'Moreover' and 'Similarly' are used, they are often placed at the start of every sentence, creating a mechanical feel. Referencing is sometimes unclear, such as in the third paragraph where the transition to the survey example feels abrupt. The conclusion restates the position but does not synthesize the arguments effectively, making the overall flow feel somewhat disjointed.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for a higher band. There are several instances of awkward collocations and word-choice errors, such as 'minimal human right' instead of 'fundamental human right', and 'offer the cost' instead of 'afford the cost'. Additionally, there are minor errors in word form, such as 'geenery' and 'unfilter water'. While the meaning is clear, the range of vocabulary is limited and relies on basic, repetitive terms throughout the essay.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but accuracy is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in articles ('in free of charge', 'in the contrast'), subject-verb agreement ('plant needs', 'human use'), and prepositions. Some sentences are grammatically incomplete or awkward, such as 'It if often argued that clean water facility is a minimal human right.' While these errors do not completely impede communication, they occur frequently enough to distract the reader and demonstrate a lack of control over complex grammatical forms.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.