Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Clean water is an essential requirement of every creature on earth. Not only humans, but every living being needs water to survive and reproduce. The Universe has granted the earth with amazing water reserves and all the individuals have complete rights to those water resources for their survival.

I fully acknowledge the fact the access to clean water is a basic human right. It's neither a luxury nor a facility, but it is a basic necessity. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. There are billions of water reserves in the world yet a lot of underdeveloped areas lacks sufficient water supply. They don't have access to clean drinking water and such issues are also overlooked by the government.

With such situations, it's cruel to charge an amount for water supply. The policy makers should first make sure water supply is adequate at every corner of the world and no underprevilaged or elite society is deprived of water usage before charging an amount. It's a gift of nature for all the living beings irrespective of their cast, race, and class, and should be provided free of cost. However, the government can definitely consider a nominal fees for supplying maintenance but only from the people who can afford. No underdeveloped societies should be forced to pay. It should be made mandatory across all countries.

In the matter of fact, some people believes that water supply should come with an amount. I don't agree to this perspective. You can not cash the nature. It's a blessing of god with no supplying limitations. A minimal maintainence fee is justified, but a full-fledged water bill doesn't make sense from any aspects. Water flows freely, it should be available freely. It's a renewable resource which can not be end with consumption, thus, charging an amount for water supply isn't justice.

In conclusion, I strongly support that every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. It's a basic human right which should be made free for all humans.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt and maintains a clear, consistent position throughout. You successfully argue for the provision of free water as a human right while acknowledging the complexity of maintenance costs. The ideas are relevant and generally well-developed, though some arguments, such as the claim that water is a 'renewable resource which can not be end with consumption,' are slightly simplistic. To reach a higher band, ensure that your supporting arguments are more nuanced and avoid over-generalizations about global water reserves. Overall, the response is well-focused and directly answers the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used effectively to separate distinct points, such as the moral argument versus the practical maintenance fee argument. Cohesive devices like 'Therefore,' 'However,' and 'In conclusion' are used to guide the reader. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical, and there are minor issues with referencing, such as 'In the matter of fact,' which is an incorrect idiom. Improving the variety and natural flow of linking phrases would enhance the overall coherence of the essay.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'underprivileged,' 'maintenance,' and 'essential requirement.' However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'cash the nature,' 'supplying limitations,' and 'underdeveloped areas lacks.' These errors occasionally impede the precision of your argument. To improve, focus on learning collocations (e.g., 'monetize natural resources' instead of 'cash the nature') and ensure that your use of less common vocabulary is accurate and contextually appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues ('some people believes,' 'areas lacks') and article usage errors ('a nominal fees'). Punctuation is generally acceptable, but there are minor slips throughout. To achieve a higher band, you need to increase the frequency of error-free complex sentences and pay closer attention to basic grammatical rules like pluralization and verb agreement, which currently occur too often to be considered 'rare' or 'occasional.'

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.