Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Water is life. So charging on water it is most cruel thing a mankind do. As it not just essential for the human kind but for all the living creatures whether its an animal or plant. So providing a proper water supply to every household is crucial thing by system.

Even scientifically 80% of human body consist of water. So it so vital for an individual to drink 8 liter of water in a day. As it make a person hydrated and even helps to make there skin healthy and naturally glowing. In addition it's natural source so regardless of fact being higher or lower class or knowing the status every human got water supply.

However the concern of being scarcity, rather being charge control the supply but give the fresh water at some specific time frame like morning 6 to 8 A.M. and in evening 7 to 8 P.M. So they store according there requirement use it. Considerably many people cannot afford the bsic requirement of food shelter so how come they afford water. Even the charging high price of water botte by shopkeeper it was also not great thing to do. Moreover spread awarnes about the saving the water so people use as much they reuired and not waste that. Through campagins or solgans like save water save earth save the mankind and future generation.

So being a system rather being made for difficult for human kind support by providing with essential thing of life. It must distribute equally.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position that water should be free. However, the development of ideas is limited. While you mention the biological necessity of water and the financial burden on the poor, the arguments lack depth and academic rigor. The suggestion to control supply via time frames is a practical point, but it is not fully explored in relation to the 'free of charge' argument. To improve, you should provide more detailed reasoning and perhaps consider counter-arguments to create a more balanced and persuasive essay. The current ideas are somewhat repetitive and rely on general statements rather than well-supported points.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which is a positive step. However, the logical flow between sentences is often disjointed. Transitions are frequently missing or misused, such as starting sentences with 'So' or 'Even' in a way that does not effectively link ideas. The use of cohesive devices is limited and sometimes mechanical, which makes the progression of arguments feel abrupt. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words (e.g., 'consequently', 'furthermore', 'nevertheless') to connect your ideas more smoothly and ensure that each paragraph has a clear, unified focus.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is quite basic and repetitive, which limits your ability to express complex ideas. There are several instances of awkward phrasing and incorrect word choices, such as 'cruel thing a mankind do' instead of 'cruel thing mankind can do' and 'being scarcity' instead of 'the issue of scarcity'. Additionally, there are frequent spelling errors like 'botte', 'awarnes', 'reuired', and 'solgans'. To improve, you need to expand your range of vocabulary to include more academic collocations and ensure you are using words in their correct grammatical form. Focus on precision and proofreading for spelling accuracy.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the reader's understanding. There are consistent issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., '80% of human body consist'), article usage, and sentence structure. Many sentences are fragmented or run-on, lacking the necessary complexity for higher bands. While there is an attempt at complex structures, they are often faulty, leading to confusion. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction, ensuring correct verb tenses, and practicing the use of articles and prepositions. Reducing the frequency of these errors is essential for achieving a higher score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.