Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Here's a **Band 7** IELTS Task 2 answer (around **270 words**) with clear ideas, natural vocabulary, and grammar suitable for Band 7.

---

**Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. Do you agree or disagree?**

Nowadays, there has been an ongoing debate about whether every household should receive a free water supply because access to clean water is a fundamental human right. I strongly agree with this view because water is essential for survival, and providing a basic amount free of charge can improve public health and reduce social inequality.

One of the main reasons for supporting this idea is that clean water is necessary for daily life. People require safe water for drinking, cooking, and maintaining personal hygiene. Without access to clean water, the risk of serious diseases and infections increases significantly. For example, many low-income families struggle to pay utility bills, which may force them to use unsafe water sources. As a result, providing a basic amount of water free of charge would help protect public health and improve the quality of life for millions of people.

Another reason is that free access to essential water can reduce the gap between rich and poor. Every individual deserves the opportunity to meet their basic needs regardless of their financial situation. Governments already provide essential public services such as healthcare and education in many countries. Similarly, ensuring a minimum free water supply would support vulnerable families and promote social welfare. However, excessive water consumption beyond the basic limit could still be charged to encourage responsible use and prevent waste.

In conclusion, I firmly agree that every household should receive a basic supply of clean water free of charge. This policy would protect public health, improve living standards, and ensure that everyone has access to one of the most essential resources for human life.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.5
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response fully addresses the prompt by taking a clear position and supporting it with relevant arguments. You have effectively balanced the idea of a 'basic human right' with the practical consideration of 'responsible use' in the third paragraph. The ideas are well-developed, particularly the link between water access and public health. To reach a higher band, you could further extend the discussion by briefly acknowledging the counter-argument—such as the potential economic burden on governments—and refuting it, which would demonstrate a more sophisticated level of critical thinking and task engagement.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between the health benefits and the social equality argument is smooth. You use cohesive devices such as 'One of the main reasons,' 'Another reason,' and 'In conclusion' effectively to guide the reader. The referencing is clear, and the paragraphing is appropriate. To improve, ensure that the connection between sentences is always natural; while your current use of cohesive devices is functional, incorporating a wider variety of linking phrases would enhance the flow further.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate a sufficient range of vocabulary to discuss the topic with precision. Phrases like 'fundamental human right,' 'social inequality,' and 'vulnerable families' are used accurately and appropriately in context. There is a good awareness of collocation, and your word choice is generally natural. To achieve a higher score, try to incorporate more sophisticated or less common lexical items, such as 'universal entitlement' or 'socio-economic disparity,' to show a greater degree of flexibility and stylistic control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay displays a good variety of complex structures, such as conditional clauses and relative clauses (e.g., 'which may force them to use...'). The majority of your sentences are error-free, and your control over punctuation is strong. The grammar is consistently accurate, which aids readability. To push into the 8.0+ range, aim to vary your sentence length and structure even more, perhaps by using more advanced inversion or participle clauses to add stylistic flair to your arguments.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.