Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Natural resources are precious and a part of the global responsibility to protect them. There is an ongoing debate, whether governments should provide basic need such as water without charges or not. In my perspective compeletly free water supply is not a wise decision for country as well as authorities.

Eventually, people cannot understand an importance of unachievable resources without paying a certain amount. For instance, if governments conduct a law to distribute free water supply, then it might be result in shortage. It is because of people would start using it excessively. Another noteworthy aspect is to preserve rain water, authorities have developed multiple programes, for example Sardar Sarover Dam. Afterall, to conduct such programes financial support is mendatory. Hence, goverments should charge a little amount of tax to provide and develop such technologies and events.

Though charges are necessary for development and protection of water, population of countryside areas cannot afford heavy tax and high amount of water bills. As a result, medium and lower income groups really deprive for basic human needs, which is unfare because ultimately everyone has rights on natural resources. So, governmemnts should organise non-payable water availibility for people who really need and make sure they will not waste it.

To conclude, cooperative approach between authority and public plays a crucial role. Low and effective charges are the better solution in favor of the both- middle class families and governments as well. So, it is a moral responsibility of people to save water and use it wisely and governments to not put high charges on it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position: that water should not be entirely free, but that support is needed for low-income groups. The ideas are relevant and generally well-developed, such as the argument regarding the potential for waste if water is free and the need for funding infrastructure like dams. However, the development is slightly uneven; while the economic argument is clear, the suggestion for a 'non-payable' system for the poor could be more thoroughly explained in terms of how it would be implemented. Overall, the response is balanced and directly answers the question.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a central theme. Cohesive devices are used throughout, such as 'For instance,' 'Another noteworthy aspect,' and 'To conclude,' which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical or awkward, such as 'Afterall' and 'Hence, goverments should charge a little amount of tax.' Additionally, there are minor issues with referencing and flow, such as the phrase 'in favor of the both- middle class families,' which disrupts the cohesion slightly. Despite these minor issues, the progression of ideas remains clear throughout the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The range of vocabulary is adequate for the task, with some attempts at more sophisticated language like 'excessively,' 'noteworthy,' and 'cooperative approach.' However, there are several spelling errors ('compeletly,' 'programes,' 'mendatory,' 'govermemnts,' 'unfare') and some awkward collocations ('conduct a law,' 'non-payable water availibility'). These errors are frequent enough to be noticeable but do not prevent the reader from understanding the intended meaning. To reach a higher band, the student should focus on accurate spelling and more natural word choices in academic contexts.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles ('an importance,' 'the better solution'), subject-verb agreement, and prepositions ('rights on natural resources' instead of 'rights to'). Punctuation is generally functional, though there are some issues with sentence boundaries and missing commas. The errors are persistent but rarely impede communication. To improve, the student should focus on article usage and proofreading for basic grammatical slips.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.