Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Access to clean water is a undoubtedly a basic human right , and i strongly agree that every household should have access to a safe water supply. However, i do not believe that water should necessarily be provided completely free of charge.

Firstly, clean water is essential for human survival and good health. People need it for drinking cooking, washing and maintaining hygiene. If water were unavailable to unaffordable , low-income families could face serious health problem. Therefore, governments should ensure that every household has access to a minimum amount of clean water, regardless of its financial situation . This could help reduce diseases and improve living standards. Government have a responsibility to protect public health. When people have access to clean water, the spread of waterborne diseases such as diarrhoea and cholera can be reduced .

On the other hand, providing unlimited water completely free of charge could lead to unnecessary waste.Water treatment , storage and transportation require significant amount of money and energy. For example , some household might leave taps running or use excessive amount water of gardening and cleaning .I believe there should be a limit of the amount of water provided for free. People who use large quantities for swimming pools, garden or other unnecessary purpose could be required to pay.

In my opinion, government should provide a basic quantity of clean water free or at a very low cost, while charging for a excessive consumption. This approach would protect people's basic right while also encouraging responsible use of this valuable resources.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

You have addressed all parts of the prompt by clearly stating your position and providing a balanced argument. You acknowledge the importance of water as a human right while providing a logical counter-argument regarding the potential for waste if it were free for everyone. Your ideas are relevant and well-developed, particularly the distinction between basic needs and excessive consumption. To reach a higher band, ensure that your supporting examples are slightly more detailed; for instance, you could mention specific government policies or economic models that successfully implement tiered pricing to further strengthen your argument.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. You use cohesive devices such as 'Firstly', 'On the other hand', and 'In my opinion' to guide the reader through your argument. Paragraphing is used effectively to separate distinct ideas. However, there are minor issues with referencing and flow; for example, the transition between the health benefits and the economic argument could be smoother. Additionally, ensure that your punctuation around cohesive devices is consistent to maintain a professional academic tone.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'waterborne diseases', 'unnecessary waste', and 'excessive consumption' appropriately. There are some minor errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'unaffordable' used as an adjective where a noun phrase might be better, and 'a excessive' (should be 'an'). While you attempt to use less common vocabulary, the overall range is sufficient but not yet sophisticated. Focusing on more precise collocations and avoiding repetitive phrasing will help you achieve a higher score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is appropriate for this level. However, there are several recurring grammatical errors, such as missing articles ('use excessive amount water of gardening'), subject-verb agreement issues ('Government have a responsibility'), and minor punctuation errors (spaces before commas). While these errors do not impede communication, they are frequent enough to prevent a higher score. To improve, pay closer attention to pluralization and article usage, and proofread specifically for small mechanical errors that occur during drafting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.