Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

access of clean water is undoubtedly very basic and essential need of humans. It is very fundamental necessity of humans but as per my opinion i disagree with a view that every government should provide water supply to each and every home with any cost. however, government should provide basic and essential water supply for free but also has to right that they can charge on excessive consumption of water.

The strongest argument for providing water free of cost is that nobody should be deprived of clean water just because of poverty. clean water is necessary for drinking, cooking and maintaining a basic hygiene. in that case a low income family will struggle if essential resources are also being charged. for example in developing area or society the people spend their major portion of household income in basic and essential resources. at that time providing a minimum quantity of water at free of cost will improve their life and health. it would also prevents disease comes from contaminated water supplies.

although it is essential, it also creates serious practical problems. water treatment, purification, maintenance, pumping and distributing systems require high investment, and these costs also has to be paid by someone either through taxes or through some utility charges. more importantly if water has no charges, people will use this essential resource with carelessness and will use it in excessive way like extra gardening, washing vehicles with plenty of water or leaving taps running.

In conclusion, clean water should should be universally accessible, this does not mean that essential resource should provide totally free. guaranteeing a basic supply while charging on excessive consumption is fairer way to approach.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

You have addressed all parts of the prompt, clearly stating your position that while water is a right, a tiered pricing system is more practical. Your ideas are relevant and logically developed. You successfully balance the humanitarian argument for free water with the economic and environmental necessity of charging for excessive use. To reach a higher band, ensure your introduction is more polished; currently, it contains several grammatical errors that slightly obscure your initial thesis. Additionally, while your arguments are clear, providing a more specific real-world example—such as a country that successfully implements a tiered water pricing policy—would further strengthen the depth of your response.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central focus: the introduction presents your stance, the second paragraph covers the benefits of free water, and the third addresses the practical challenges of such a system. You use cohesive devices like 'however,' 'although,' and 'more importantly' to link your thoughts. However, the flow is occasionally hindered by minor punctuation and capitalization issues, such as starting sentences with lowercase letters. Improving the variety of your linking phrases and ensuring consistent paragraph structure will help you achieve a higher score in this category.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'excessive consumption,' 'contaminated,' and 'universally accessible.' However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and word choice, such as 'with any cost' instead of 'at no cost' and 'in that case' used where a more precise transition like 'consequently' would be better. There are also some repetitive uses of basic words. To improve, focus on using more precise collocations and avoiding minor errors in word formation, such as 'at free of cost,' which should simply be 'free of charge' or 'at no cost.'

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is good. However, there are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation that occasionally distract the reader. Examples include missing articles ('in developing area'), subject-verb agreement issues ('these costs also has to be paid'), and capitalization errors (starting sentences with lowercase letters). While these errors do not impede overall communication, they are persistent throughout the text. To improve, focus on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and ensuring that every sentence begins with a capital letter and ends with appropriate punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.