Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some believe every household should have a free of cost water access as purified water is considered a general human right. I agree with the statement because people should not pay for basic needs and can spend the money on something more important.

People should not generally waste money on something so basic like water in everyday life. As human beings, we have the right to use water at any time of the day without caring about the cost that comes with it because we use it for almost everything on a daily basis such as, preparing meals, cleaning, drinking, showering and so on. Basic needs come with just being born and so it should be free. For example, in Japan, every house has free access to water because their government really care about the standard of life and basic human needs. Hence, the country is peaceful and more happy.

Moreover, the monthly expenditure of water supply can easily be spent on something else which is crucial. Many poor to middle class families have to lead their lives within a tight budget which stop them from investing on skills, entertainment, education, future or sometimes better health. Therefore, if the water supply is free, they can spend the money on something else which has more value to them. For example, my cousin started guitar lesson recently after moving to an apartment where daily water supply was free so his parents used that money on his passion.

In conclusion, i agree that water supply in households should be free of cost as basic human needs should be free as well as money kept for water bill can be used on something more meaningful

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt clearly and maintains a consistent position throughout. The arguments regarding the human right to water and the economic benefits for families are relevant and supported by examples, such as the mention of Japan and the personal anecdote about a cousin. However, the development of ideas is somewhat simplistic. The example regarding Japan is a generalization that lacks nuance, and the argument could be strengthened by discussing the complexities of public utility funding or the environmental impact of free water. To reach a higher band, you should aim to explore the counter-arguments or the broader implications of your position more deeply.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'Moreover', 'Therefore', and 'In conclusion' are used to link ideas effectively. However, the flow within paragraphs is occasionally mechanical. For instance, the transition between the general statement about human rights and the specific example of Japan could be smoother. Additionally, the referencing is sometimes repetitive, and the use of punctuation, particularly the comma usage in lists, could be more precise to improve the overall readability and logical progression of the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There is an attempt to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'monthly expenditure', 'tight budget', and 'basic human needs'. However, the range is somewhat limited, and there are instances of slightly unnatural phrasing, such as 'free of cost water access' and 'more happy'. To improve, you should focus on using more sophisticated collocations and avoiding repetitive phrasing. Expanding your range of academic vocabulary would help elevate the tone of the essay and demonstrate greater precision in your arguments.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are several grammatical errors, such as 'every house has free access... because their government really care' (subject-verb agreement) and 'stop them from investing on skills' (preposition error). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of commas in lists and before conjunctions. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and refining the use of complex sentence structures will help improve your accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.