Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Access to clean water is widely regarded as a fundamental human right because it is essential for survival health. While I strongly agree with this notion that every one should have access to safe drinking water, However I disagree that all household water supplies should be provided entirely free of charge.

Firstly, there are several reason who government should guarantee access to a basic amount of clean water because water is indispensable of daily life and without it people have to face serious health issues such as dehydration and disease. In many develop countries poor families struggle to afford safe water and rely on other sources. Providing a minimum quality of free water would help reduce inequality and improvement of health.

However, supply unlimited water free of charge is neither practical nor sustainable. Firstly storing and distributing water require substanial investment in technology and maintenance. If household were not required to pay anything government would need cover this cost through text. which could place a significant burden on national budget. It may also encourage wastefull consumption. because they may less likely to conserve water some region water resources are already limitThe measure is that to provide a basic amount of water is Free which complete essential needs and pay for additional consumption.

In conclusion although access to clean water is undeniably a basic human right however, I reckon that all domestic water supply should be chared free which requiring a payment for excessive use to remain sustainability and efficiency.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

You have addressed the prompt by presenting a clear position, though the response falls slightly short of the 250-word minimum requirement. While you acknowledge the importance of water as a human right, you effectively argue against the idea of it being entirely free. However, some ideas are under-developed; for instance, the mention of 'text' (taxes) and 'wastefull consumption' could be expanded with more specific examples or logical links to support your argument. The conclusion contradicts your earlier statement by stating 'all domestic water supply should be chared free', which creates confusion regarding your final stance. To improve, ensure your conclusion aligns perfectly with your introduction and body paragraphs.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and you use transition signals like 'Firstly', 'However', and 'In conclusion' to guide the reader. However, the flow is occasionally disrupted by mechanical errors in sentence structure and punctuation. For example, the sentence 'which could place a significant burden on national budget. It may also encourage wastefull consumption. because they may less likely to conserve water' contains fragmented sentences that hinder the logical progression. Improving the use of cohesive devices to link these fragments into fluid, complex sentences would significantly enhance the overall coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'indispensable', 'sustainable', and 'consumption'. However, there are several instances of incorrect word choice and spelling errors, such as 'develop countries' (developing), 'text' (taxes), 'chared' (charged), and 'limitThe' (limited). These errors occasionally distract the reader but do not fully impede communication. To reach a higher band, focus on using more precise collocations and ensure that your spelling is accurate, as these small slips currently limit your ability to convey complex ideas with complete clarity and sophistication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is a positive step. However, there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ('there are several reason who government should'), missing articles, and incorrect sentence boundaries. For example, 'which complete essential needs and pay for additional consumption' is a fragment. While these errors rarely make the meaning impossible to understand, they are frequent enough to prevent a higher score. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement will help you achieve greater accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.