Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

These days the supply of clean water should be provided free of cost is a basic human right for every citizen. Some people believe that they should have pay the water bills. In my opinion water should be free for every household and i completely agree with this opinion and in this essay i will support my opinion with example.

Firstly, water is essential for human life charging treats should not consider because authorities should prevent water as zero amount as access of clean water should be the right of every person and clean water can also reduce the overall healthcare burden from the government. Furthermore, underprivileged have not afford the huge amount of bills to be paid for daily essentials. For instance, if they were not have accessed with clean water they might they monetized leading to hygiene and health disparities.

Secondly, some people argued that water supply should not free because when resource usage has zero financial cost, consumers tend to waste it. For instance, leaving taps running, watering lawns excessively. Moreover, a better system might provide a basic monthly quota of water for free, charging money only for luxury consumption beyond that limit. Free water services could drain national budgets, taking funds away from education, transport, or healthcare.

In conclusion, I completely agree that governments should provide residential water free of charge because it is a fundamental human necessity. Ultimately, free access protects public health and ensures social equality, while the necessary infrastructure costs should be covered through general public taxation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. You have provided relevant arguments for both sides of the issue, which demonstrates a good understanding of the task. However, some ideas are slightly under-developed; for instance, the point about 'healthcare burden' could be expanded with more specific detail. Additionally, the second paragraph contains some awkward phrasing, such as 'charging treats should not consider', which obscures the intended meaning. To reach a higher band, ensure that your arguments are fully extended and that your position is consistently supported with clear, logical reasoning throughout the essay.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. You use cohesive devices such as 'Firstly', 'Furthermore', 'For instance', and 'In conclusion' to guide the reader. However, the flow is occasionally interrupted by mechanical or awkward phrasing, such as 'if they were not have accessed with clean water they might they monetized'. While the overall progression is clear, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes repetitive or slightly forced. Improving the variety of your linking words and ensuring that sentences flow more naturally into one another would enhance the coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'fundamental human necessity', 'underprivileged', and 'infrastructure'. However, there are several instances of word-choice errors and awkward collocations, such as 'charging treats should not consider' and 'they might they monetized'. These errors occasionally make the text difficult to follow. To improve, focus on using vocabulary in context and ensuring that your word choices are precise. Expanding your range to include more sophisticated, topic-specific collocations would help you achieve a higher score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. Examples include 'the supply of clean water should be provided free of cost is a basic human right', which is a run-on sentence, and 'underprivileged have not afford', which lacks the correct verb form. Punctuation is generally acceptable, but the frequency of errors in verb tense and sentence construction prevents a higher score. Focus on mastering basic sentence structure and subject-verb agreement before attempting more complex grammatical forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.