Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the recent year, one of some things which should be necessary to observe for government is water purity related issue which are faced by every citizens . every local person of particular area has a right to drink and use clean and pure water in their lives. so that it should be free providation of water in any local residence of that area is essential in nation. i would agree through that sentence of basic water supply for human lives should be free of cost.

Let me talk about first aspects of this topic is use of fresh water can enhance individual's lives and brings more freshness into their daily routine. through this type of changes in local services may reduce health related issue of civilians. let me explain this sentence with an example city A which have better quality of water supply is free and on the other hand a city B with paid water supply according to the quality of water, people may affect by any type of health related illness in that city , whereas in the city A citizen's would happy with their local services and they feel comfortable with whatever type of quality of water are they drink.

Secondly, Local government should take some action on these type of services so the human society of their nation be happy with their current government. if government do not listen the argument of individuals . citizens should do peaceful protest against the government and demand for clean water supply should be free. from the consuming clean water individual's lives become heathier and full with joy and happiness . therefore they become more productive and more calm during their work time.

to sum up all those things i would like to say that to give free water with purity brings more productivity in the nation. moreover government should understand that it is a basic human right to consume that .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of free water supply. However, the development of ideas is limited. The arguments regarding health benefits and government accountability are somewhat repetitive and lack depth. The example provided (City A vs. City B) is hypothetical and underdeveloped, failing to provide a concrete or persuasive illustration of the issue. To reach a higher band, you should provide more specific, real-world examples or logical consequences to support your claims, ensuring that each paragraph contributes a distinct, well-reasoned point to the overall argument.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'Let me talk about first aspects' and 'to sum up all those things'. Transitions between sentences are sometimes abrupt, and the logical flow within paragraphs is hindered by awkward phrasing. While there is an overall progression, the lack of sophisticated linking words makes the essay feel disjointed. Improving the variety and precision of your cohesive devices will significantly enhance the readability of your work.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally limited and repetitive. There are several instances of awkward word choices and non-standard collocations, such as 'free providation', 'health related issue of civilians', and 'full with joy'. While the meaning is generally clear, the range of vocabulary is not sufficient to demonstrate flexibility or precision. To improve, focus on learning topic-specific collocations (e.g., 'public utility', 'socio-economic impact') and avoid using informal or conversational fillers like 'Let me talk about'. Expanding your range to include more academic and precise terminology is essential.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow of reading. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('every citizens', 'government do not listen'), incorrect article usage, and awkward sentence structures ('one of some things which should be necessary to observe'). There is a lack of complex sentence structures, and the punctuation is inconsistent. While the meaning is usually understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. You should focus on mastering basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement and pluralization.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.