Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Clean water is a basic human right. Every single person in society deserve to drink and eat clean things. Because, it is crucial for their hygiene. One wrong sip of drink can lead to various disease and can cause health issues. So, yes I agree that every individual deserve to eat and drink filtered.

First and foremost, water is necessary for basic human needs. Since, it is vital for good health of people. Water is used for different kind of things. For instance, washing, cooking, cleaning, drinking etc. So, that it is important to maintain hygiene. In any case, if someone uses dirty water it can lead to disease like cholera. If water is expensive, poor families may be forced to use unsafe sources to get water.

On the other hand, many people cant afford filtered water. That is why, some people uses un-hygienic water sources. Most of the time water isn't available in water stress areas. So, people living their depends on sea or rivers water. I strongly agree that the water those people use is highly un-hygienic. In addition, that cause diseases and the individuals became sick.

Furthermore, government should provide free water sources to such areas. Another important reason is that free access to water would create greater equality in society. Low-income families often have to spend a considerable part of their income on basic necessities. If they do not have to pay for water, they can use their limited money for food, education and healthcare. In addition, children would not need to spend several hours collecting water from distant sources. Instead, they could attend school and have better opportunities in the future.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that water is a basic human right. Due to people hygiene and good health it is necessary. Or I disagree with the contradict that the people who pays taxes should buy clean water from the shops.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of free water supply. The ideas are relevant, particularly the discussion on equality and the economic benefits for low-income families. However, the development is somewhat uneven. The introduction is repetitive, and the conclusion is confusing, particularly the final sentence which contradicts the essay's main argument. While the main body paragraphs provide some support, the reasoning could be more sophisticated to reach a higher band. The response covers all parts of the task, but the lack of clarity in the conclusion prevents a higher score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'First and foremost', 'On the other hand', and 'Furthermore', though some are used mechanically or incorrectly (e.g., 'In any case' is used inappropriately to introduce a consequence). Referencing is sometimes unclear, such as in the phrase 'people living their depends on sea', where the pronoun usage is faulty. Paragraphing is present, but the transition between ideas could be smoother to improve the overall flow of the argument.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There is frequent repetition of basic words like 'water', 'clean', and 'people'. Some word choices are awkward or incorrect, such as 'filtered' used as a noun, 'un-hygienic' (which is better as 'unsanitary'), and 'contradict' used incorrectly in the conclusion. While the meaning is generally clear, the range of vocabulary is limited, and there is little evidence of less common lexical items or sophisticated collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors. Subject-verb agreement is a recurring issue, such as 'every single person... deserve' (should be 'deserves') and 'individuals became sick' (should be 'become'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with unnecessary commas and sentence fragments like 'Because, it is crucial for their hygiene.' These errors are noticeable, though they do not usually prevent the reader from understanding the intended message.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.