Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Availability of clean water is a simple human right.Therefore, every house should have availability of water supply that is supplied without money. I agree the given statement to a large extent.My position is elaborated further with reasons and relevant examples.

The foremost argument to support my stand is that clean water supply is basic human need. This is essential to maintain our overall well-being and physical health.our body is composed of 60% of water.It aids us to stay active and to detox our body.In particular clean water supply support individuals to keep their body from harmful toxins.As mineral water is available in stores enforcing people to utilize them by providing adds related to the benefits of clear water.If it is easily available at home people will definitely consume it with keep in mind it's benefits as well as it reduces the expense that people have to spent on water supply from various shops.

The other point to justify my view is that clean water play a integral role in preventing us from being sick.Most of the diseases present day are the consequence of polluted water all around the world.It is the need of hour to supply free clear water at communities for general public as it enhances their mind and body too by clearing the intestine and number of absentee owing to the increase proportion of sickness by intake of contaminated water.

To conclude, my pint that available of clear water is effortless and every household should have access to this as it will eliminate various disease and expenses of buying water from shops is reasonably acceptable.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. You have identified the core argument—that clean water is a basic right—and supported it with points regarding health and disease prevention. However, the development is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument about 'mineral water' is slightly confusing and does not directly support the idea of free government-provided water. To reach a higher band, you should expand on the economic or social implications of providing free water, rather than just stating it is a 'need'. The ideas are relevant but lack the depth required for a higher score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear introduction and conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat mechanical and occasionally repetitive. For example, the transition 'The other point to justify my view' is functional but basic. There are also issues with sentence-level cohesion, such as the abrupt start to sentences like 'our body is composed of 60% of water.' Improving the flow between sentences and using a wider variety of linking words would enhance the overall coherence of the argument.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You have an adequate range of vocabulary to express your ideas, but there are several instances of awkward word choices and inaccuracies. Phrases like 'supplied without money' (should be 'provided free of charge') and 'need of hour' (should be 'need of the hour') indicate a lack of precision. Additionally, there are some word-form errors, such as 'available of clear water' instead of 'availability of clean water'. While the meaning is generally clear, the vocabulary lacks the sophistication and natural collocation expected at higher bands.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader. Common issues include missing articles (e.g., 'at communities'), incorrect verb forms (e.g., 'people have to spent'), and punctuation errors, such as missing spaces after periods. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they occur frequently enough to lower the score. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement, consistent use of articles, and ensuring that complex sentences are constructed accurately.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.