Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is often argue that access to clean water is a basic human right and every individuals should have a water supply free of charge. I completely agree with this notion as it is neccessary to sustain human life without any disease and goverment is responsible to give minimum house supplies.
one of the main reasons i agree with notion is that without clean water there are many chance of people getting sick from diseases like malaria and colera so it is essential that everyone get clean water for cooking and drinking by proving clean water goverment cant subtanquently reduce the risk of these deadly disease. For instance, drinking clean water help people to healthy and hydrated and it is also neccessary in cooking so we can aviod so much of disease and be healthy.As a result, providing clean water is the only solution for eradicate this situations.
Furthermore, free household water would help reduce economic inequality. Low-income families already have to spend a considerable proportion of their income on essential goods such as food, housing and electricity. Charging them for a basic necessity such as water could place an additional financial burden on these households. If governments provided water free of charge, disadvantaged people would be able to use their limited income for other essential needs, such as education and healthcare. This would create a fairer society in which everyone could enjoy a basic standard of living.
Admittedly, providing water completely free of charge could increase the risk of unnecessary consumption. However, governments could address this problem through water-saving campaigns, household usage limits and penalties for excessive wastage. In this way, people could receive the water they need for essential purposes without encouraging irresponsible consumption.
In conclusion, I completely agree that every household should receive a free water supply. Since clean water is vital for health and hygiene and is particularly important for protecting disadvantaged families, governments should ensure that this basic necessity is available to everyone regardless of their financial circumstances.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses all parts of the prompt, maintaining a clear position throughout. The arguments regarding public health and economic equality are relevant and well-supported. The ideas are extended with logical reasoning, such as the suggestion of usage limits to mitigate the risk of waste. While the introduction is slightly weak due to grammatical errors, the overall development of the argument is sufficient to meet the requirements for a Band 7.0. The essay effectively balances the benefits of free water with a practical counter-argument, demonstrating a good understanding of the task requirements.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between the benefits of free water and the potential drawback of wastage is handled well using 'Admittedly' and 'However'. Cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore', 'As a result', and 'In this way' are used effectively to link sentences and paragraphs. While some transitions are slightly mechanical, the overall structure is clear and easy to follow, justifying a Band 7.0.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, with some attempts at more sophisticated language like 'disadvantaged families', 'financial burden', and 'irresponsible consumption'. However, there are several spelling errors, such as 'neccessary', 'goverment', 'colera', and 'subtanquently', which detract from the overall quality. Additionally, some phrasing is slightly awkward, such as 'many chance of people getting sick'. While the range is sufficient to convey meaning clearly, the frequency of spelling and minor word-choice errors limits the score to a 6.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, particularly in the first paragraph, such as 'It is often argue' (should be 'argued') and 'every individuals' (should be 'every individual'). Subject-verb agreement and article usage are inconsistent throughout the text. While the meaning is never obscured and the writer demonstrates an ability to construct complex sentences, the frequency of these errors prevents a higher score. The control of punctuation is generally good, but the grammatical slips are persistent.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.