Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-20
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Water is a basic life necessity. One can survive for days without food but without water, really odd to live. Seventyfive percent of the earth is all water. Every living organism such as animals, plants, and soil all desire water. So do humans to perform their daily life activities such as bathe, clean and much more useful activities. Humans need clean water to drink as well as for house chores.
Clean water is their want and need. This is a straightforward agreement to having clean water as a basic human right.With contaminated water their will be alot of mess. One would get ill and could contract severe diseases by drinking infected water. Severe issues would be caused during and after doing house chores as cleanliness could not be maintained. Where a person in living; a city, a small town, or where so ever the government there or the councils there should handle this. It will be their loss if some contageous disease gets spread because of this, as their will be loose in their population. Morally it is not right to discard someone from this source. Cleanliness overll should be at the top priority so water cleanliness should be.
Clean water is not a luxury or a market privilege, it is a vital pillar of life as well as for human rights. Governments and councils etc must treat waters cleanliness as their top priority. Protecting water sources and paying in universal access confirms a healthier and safer future for everyone.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of free water access. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. While you mention health risks and government responsibility, the arguments lack depth and specific examples. For instance, you could have discussed the economic feasibility of free water or the potential for waste if it is not priced. The essay is quite repetitive, particularly in the introduction and body paragraphs, which limits the overall impact of your argument. To reach a higher band, focus on extending your points with more detailed reasoning or real-world examples rather than restating the same basic necessity of water.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into three paragraphs, which is a logical structure. However, the flow between sentences is often mechanical. You rely on simple transitions like 'So do humans' or 'This is a straightforward agreement', which do not always connect ideas smoothly. There are also issues with referencing; for example, 'Where a person in living; a city, a small town, or where so ever the government there or the councils there should handle this' is quite disjointed and difficult to follow. Improving the use of cohesive devices and ensuring that each sentence builds logically upon the previous one would significantly enhance the readability of your writing.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for higher bands. You use basic terms like 'really odd', 'alot of mess', and 'useful activities', which are somewhat informal and imprecise. There are also several spelling and word-choice errors, such as 'contageous' (contagious), 'overll' (overall), and 'discard' (which is used incorrectly here; 'deprive' would be more appropriate). To improve, try to incorporate more academic collocations and precise terminology related to public policy and health, while ensuring you check for common spelling errors.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('their will be alot of mess'), incorrect preposition usage, and awkward phrasing ('where so ever the government there'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of semicolons and commas. While the meaning is generally clear, the high frequency of errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement and article usage will help you achieve greater accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.