Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is one of the main basic needs of human to access clean water supply. However, some people believe that it it should be free of cost while other say that there should be a little amount of taxes. I partially agree with that and this essay will discuss about why it should be available to every human beings.

To commence with, one of the major benefits of drinking clean water is that it can lead to significantly decrease in disease ratio associated with stomach. Therefore, availability of clean water to every human beings is their basic right, that should not be ignored. It should be free of cost and the government should be responsible for to ensure that facility especially in remote areas where there is no concept of quality of life and people are living below the poor line. It should be a primary concern for those poor people to get that facility free of cost.

On the flip side of coin, many people believe that there should be some charges to supply that basic need. Furthermore they think that those people who are living in urban area and are earning handsome amount can pay taxes to get access of clean water. However, these taxes should be utilized to facilitate the people living in remote areas for getting free excess of clean drinking water.

To sum up, I would say that clean water is the basic need for all human beings. As far as the charges are concern, I agree that people who are earning good amount of money and paying other taxes, they can pay easily the water charges as well. Hence those who are living under the financial conditions should get that access free of cost.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both sides of the argument regarding free water supply. You clearly state your position in the introduction and maintain it throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, while you mention the 'disease ratio' and 'remote areas,' these points could be expanded with more specific examples or logical reasoning to reach a higher band. The conclusion effectively summarizes your stance, but ensure that all parts of the prompt are explored with equal depth to fully satisfy the requirements of the task.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. You use some cohesive devices such as 'To commence with,' 'On the flip side of coin,' and 'To sum up' to guide the reader. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical or unnatural, such as 'On the flip side of coin' (missing an article). Additionally, the referencing within sentences is occasionally unclear, which affects the flow. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring they are used more naturally will help improve the overall cohesion of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'significantly decrease,' 'facility,' and 'financial conditions.' However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'disease ratio associated with stomach' (should be 'incidence of water-borne diseases'), 'poor line' (should be 'poverty line'), and 'free excess' (should be 'free access'). These errors do not impede communication, but they do limit the precision and sophistication of your expression. Expanding your vocabulary to include more academic collocations would be beneficial.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text. Examples include 'it it should be,' 'government should be responsible for to ensure,' and 'As far as the charges are concern.' These errors, along with missing articles and subject-verb agreement issues, occur frequently. While the meaning remains clear, the high frequency of these slips prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy and sentence construction will significantly improve your score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.