Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent years, Access to clean water is a basic human right. So every home should have a water supply that is provided free of cost has become a matter of considerable debate. I strongly agree with this view because water is a most important part of people lives. Without water people cannot live also animals, birds, plants or any living thing.

One of the primary reasons for my position is that clean water is a basic human need and governments should need to supply water without any charges. If people cannot use clean water it can effect on their health as well as animals. For instance, it can create many health problems like, constipation, stomach issues, fever, flue or many other serious issues. As a result, if people are not feeling well they cannot go on their works properly which can also effect on economy of the country.

Another key point to consider is that if plants cannot consume clean water they can be dead which can hardly effect on our environment and it also changes our climate control. For example, in this case trees or plant cannot produce carbon dioxide and it creates breathe problems in people or animals. As a result, so that's why governments should need to provide clean water in every area. They also need to spend funding on this procedures.

In conclusion, clean water is a basic human right of all living things without this surviving is not possible, so that's why governments need to special attention on it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. While you mention health and environmental impacts, the arguments lack depth and specific examples. For instance, the claim that plants 'produce carbon dioxide' is scientifically inaccurate, which undermines the quality of your supporting evidence. To improve, focus on expanding your arguments with more logical reasoning and ensuring that your examples are factually sound. The conclusion is also quite brief and does not fully synthesize the points made in the body paragraphs.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or repetitive (e.g., 'As a result' is used multiple times). Some transitions are awkward, such as 'In this case' or 'So that's why', which do not always connect ideas logically. The referencing is sometimes unclear, particularly in the second paragraph where the link between water consumption and the national economy is stated but not explained. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring smoother transitions between sentences would significantly enhance the flow of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the range and precision required for higher bands. You rely on basic terms like 'important', 'problems', and 'things'. There are also some errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'free of cost' (better: 'free of charge'), 'go on their works' (better: 'perform their jobs'), and 'breathe problems' (better: 'breathing difficulties'). To reach a higher band, you should aim to use more sophisticated vocabulary and collocations that are appropriate for an academic context, while ensuring that your word choices are accurate and natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'trees or plant cannot produce'), incorrect preposition usage, and awkward phrasing (e.g., 'governments should need to supply'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage in lists. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focus on mastering basic sentence construction and proofreading for common errors like pluralization and verb tense consistency.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.