Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Access to clean water is essential for the human survival and its a fundamental right of every human. I strongly agree with this statement that every household should have the access of reliable water without charging any bill. its out Government responsiblities to provide safe and clean water for everyone.

To initate with, free access to clean water can significantly improve the public health. Impure water can cause many serious diseases like diarrhoea, cholera and other infections particularly among children. If every household should have a clean and pure water to maintain better hygiene and reduce the spread of infectious disease. For example, poor families and rural communities people donot afford pure water so they suffer from various disease conditions, so a public water supply could greatly improve their standard of living and overall health.

Furthermore, Free water can help to reduce social inequality. Water is not a luxury item, it is essential for cooking , bathing, drinking and cleaning. Charging a high amount for this essential thing can increase the burden on poor families. its responsiblity of our Government to providing a basic amount of water fee and can ensure that poor household have the same opportunity to maintain a healthy lifestyle. However, completely free and unlimited water consumption could lead to wastage and put pressure on public finances. Therefore, governments could provide each household with a reasonable amount of water free of charge and charge for excessive consumption.

In the conclusion, I strongly agree that every home should receive a basic water supply free of cost because clean water is essential for health and human dignity.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, clearly stating a position in favor of free water supply. The ideas are relevant, focusing on public health and social equality. However, the development is somewhat uneven. While the health argument is supported with examples, the discussion on economic feasibility is a bit brief. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points. To reach a higher band, you should aim to expand on the counter-argument regarding 'wastage' more thoroughly to demonstrate a more nuanced understanding of the complexities involved in government policy.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear central theme. Cohesive devices such as 'To initiate with', 'Furthermore', and 'In the conclusion' are used to guide the reader. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical, and there are minor issues with referencing, such as the use of 'its' instead of 'it is' or 'it's'. The progression of ideas is generally clear, but the flow could be improved by using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring that the relationship between sentences is always explicit.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'social inequality', 'fundamental right', and 'excessive consumption'. There are some instances of word-choice errors or awkward phrasing, such as 'access of reliable water' (should be 'access to') and 'donot afford' (should be 'cannot afford'). While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey your meaning clearly, it lacks the precision and sophistication required for higher bands. Focusing on collocations and more academic phrasing would significantly enhance your lexical score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement and punctuation. Examples include 'its out Government responsiblities' (should be 'it is the government's responsibility') and 'donot' (should be 'do not'). Additionally, there are several missing articles and capitalization errors. While these errors do not impede communication, they are frequent enough to prevent a higher score. You should focus on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy and ensuring consistent use of articles and possessives.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.