Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Access to clean water is a fundamental necessity. Some people argue that every home should have a water supply provided without any cost. I believe that everyone should have access to drinking water, but providing unlimited water supply completely free is not practical. This essay intends to discuss the views before explaining my viewpoint.

On the one hand, drinking water is essential for human being. People need clean water for cooking, drinking and basic hygiene. Charging high prices for water supply can not be sustainable for low-income families and preventing them for clean water can lead to serious health issues. Government should take responsibility that the disadvantaged individuals are not deprived of essential resource. For example, providing a basic quantity of water and heavily subsidized water can be beneficial to meet the need of poorer households.

On the other hand, making all households water completely free can lead to the problems like excessive and unnecessary use of clean water and this would create a great burden on the government. Government also has to use taxpayers money to create infrastructure for water treatment and transportation. Moreover, when people do not pay for what they consume, they will think that it is in abundance and will not have any incentive to preserve it. A more effective approach can be to provide a basic quantity to water free of charges to every households, while charging higher rates for excessive consumption.

In conclusion, I believe that water is universal and essential for every human being. Nevertheless, I disagree that every household should have unlimited water supply free of charges. Government should provide basic quantity of water and charging an reasonable amount to encourage preservation of water and maintain the required infrastructure.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

You have clearly addressed all parts of the prompt, maintaining a consistent position throughout the essay. You acknowledge the importance of water as a human right while providing a nuanced argument against making it entirely free. The ideas are well-developed, particularly the distinction between basic needs and excessive consumption. To reach a higher band, you could further extend your examples; for instance, mentioning a specific country or a hypothetical policy model would add depth to your argument. Overall, your response is focused and directly answers the question asked.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. You use cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'Moreover' effectively to guide the reader through your argument. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas. While the flow is generally smooth, some transitions could be more sophisticated to avoid a slightly mechanical feel. For example, instead of 'The essay intends to discuss', you could use a more integrated approach to introduce your thesis. Overall, the progression of ideas is clear and easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'fundamental necessity', 'subsidized', and 'infrastructure' correctly. There are some minor inaccuracies in word choice, such as 'human being' (should be plural 'human beings') and 'free of charges' (should be 'free of charge'). While you successfully convey your meaning, the vocabulary is somewhat functional rather than sophisticated. To improve, try to incorporate more precise collocations and less common lexical items to demonstrate a wider range and better control over nuance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is appropriate for this level. However, there are several grammatical errors that persist, such as 'preventing them for clean water' (should be 'from'), 'Government should take responsibility that' (should be 'ensure that'), and 'every households' (should be 'every household'). While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and preposition usage will help you achieve greater accuracy in your writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.