Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-22
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Increasingly, debate surrounding the widespread shify towards clean water as a basic human right has gained significant attention. Although there are different views on this matter, I strongly believe that removing monetary charges on the water usage to ensure enough water supply to everyone is the most pragmatic approach to adopt in modern society.
A primary justification for this view is that it significantly enhances not only water affordability but also ensures its proper supply to the poor. Specifically, poor people can use clean water and comfortably enjoy a healthy life-style. For instance, many healthcare institutions reported a massive improvements in the hygeine of the poor people.
Admittely, a noticeable incline in the wastage of water cannot be ignored. This is specifically because people with overuse the water as it is free of cost. To illustrate this drawback, many municipalities often find it extremely difficult to meet increasing demand of water supply. However, provided there is sensible management this issue can be resolved. Therefore, we should still focus on removing monetary charges on the water usage to ensure enough water supply to everyone rather than worrying too much about short-term consequences.
In conclusion, when looking at the issue of clean water as a basic human right
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 250 words, as it is only 206 words long. Furthermore, the essay is incomplete, ending abruptly in the middle of the conclusion. While you clearly state your position and provide some relevant arguments regarding affordability and water wastage, the development of these ideas is limited due to the unfinished nature of the text. To reach a higher band, you must ensure you complete the essay and provide a more thorough exploration of your arguments, including a fully developed conclusion that summarises your main points.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay demonstrates a basic logical flow, with clear paragraphing used to separate the introduction, body paragraphs, and the start of the conclusion. You use some cohesive devices such as 'A primary justification', 'Specifically', and 'However' to link ideas. However, because the essay is incomplete, the overall progression is interrupted. The lack of a finished conclusion significantly impacts the coherence of the final piece. To improve, ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and that your concluding paragraph effectively synthesises the arguments presented earlier.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
You have an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'pragmatic approach', 'monetary charges', and 'municipalities'. There are some minor errors in word choice and spelling, such as 'shify' instead of 'shift', 'hygeine' instead of 'hygiene', and 'Admittely' instead of 'Admittedly'. While these errors do not impede communication, they indicate a need for more careful proofreading. To achieve a higher score, try to incorporate more precise collocations and ensure that your spelling is accurate throughout the text.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as 'Although there are different views on this matter, I strongly believe...'. There are several grammatical errors, including 'massive improvements' (should be 'a massive improvement' or 'massive improvements'), 'people with overuse' (should be 'people will overuse'), and 'meet increasing demand of water' (should be 'the increasing demand for water'). While these errors are noticeable, they do not prevent the reader from understanding your main points. Focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of articles to improve your accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.