Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Being human beings, as the residents of the Earth, everyone has the right to access water, but not necessarily free of charge. However, it is undeniable that clean water is not simply natural water and requires treatment for household purposes. Clean water is distributed to each household through water treatment companies, which were built with government investment. Moreover, the waste of water resources has always been a huge issue that needs to be addressed globally. Hence, I argue that it is necessary to charge appropriate fees.

Every single year, the authority invests lots of funds to enhance and develop various water treatment companies to treat and supply water for individuals. A large number of staff members need to be paid, and machines require maintenance costs. If we start to implement free charge of water supply, which means the costs need to be covered by other means, such as individual income tax. Furthermore, the government may shorten the funds for other investment projects, like education and healthcare, which are significant for citizens.

From a family situation, there is plenty of water for daily life, such as cleaning clothes, cooking and showering. If the community does not need to pay for these expenses, it may lead to the waste of water resources . People's awareness of protecting water resources may decrease directly. Additionally, a variety of manufacturers need water to be used on the production line. Providing water free of charge may not only lead to wasteful water usage among workers on the production line but also reduce the awareness of water treatment among some factories. Therefore, I believe an appropriate charging policy is effective in managing human behaviour.

Conclusion

In summary, I sincerely appreciate that more and more people have the cognition of protecting water resources to avoid wasting

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt clearly, taking a firm position against free water supply. The ideas are relevant, focusing on the economic costs of treatment and the environmental impact of waste. However, the development is slightly uneven; while the economic argument is well-supported, the conclusion is incomplete and lacks a final summary of the main points, which weakens the overall task completion. To reach a higher band, ensure that the conclusion synthesizes the arguments presented rather than trailing off. The position is consistent throughout, but the final paragraph needs to be fully realized to ensure all parts of the task are addressed with equal depth.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized into distinct paragraphs, each focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. Cohesive devices such as 'Moreover,' 'Furthermore,' and 'Additionally' are used to link ideas, though some transitions feel slightly mechanical. The progression of ideas is clear, moving from the economic necessity of charging to the behavioral impact on consumers. However, the lack of a proper concluding sentence in the final paragraph disrupts the overall flow. Improving the variety of cohesive devices and ensuring each paragraph has a strong, complete structure would enhance the coherence of the response.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally appropriate and sufficient for the task. You use terms like 'water treatment companies,' 'individual income tax,' and 'human behaviour' effectively. There are some instances of slightly unnatural phrasing, such as 'implement free charge of water supply' and 'cognition of protecting,' which could be refined for better collocation. While the range is adequate to convey your meaning, incorporating more sophisticated, topic-specific vocabulary would help elevate the score. Focus on using more precise academic collocations to demonstrate a higher level of lexical control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There is a good attempt at using complex sentences, such as 'If the community does not need to pay for these expenses, it may lead to the waste of water resources.' However, there are occasional grammatical slips, such as 'the authority invests lots of funds' (should be 'a lot of' or 'significant funds') and 'shorten the funds' (should be 'reduce funding'). Punctuation is generally accurate, but the incomplete final sentence is a notable error. Increasing the frequency of error-free complex structures will help improve this score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.