Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often argued that having clean water for daily use is an essential necessity of human life. Another thing to considerate is that it should be free of charge for every home. I strongly agree with the statement of providing pure water to citizens.

First of all, compared to past now access to clean water is relatively easy due to the development of modern filtration plants and latest purification technology. For example, the government can introduce advanced filtration plants in different areas for free. In that case, people do not have to face difficulty in collecting mineral water because they can conveniently get it in their neighborhood. Although there is a less likely hood of consumption of impure water and spread of fatal diseases among people.

Secondly, the cost really matters. In the third world countries, where most of the people are below average. They can't afford to drink mineral water and thus heavily rely on sanitary and impure water because of financial crisis. As a result, they become easily affected by deadly diseases and may lose their lives. Resultantly, clean water should be free for under developed countries.

Turning to the other side, the filtration plants require heavy investments and resources. For under developed countries, it can be problematic to provide clean water to citizens for free. In that case, the government can impose slight tax on public that can afford by almost every single family.

All things considered, it is extremely important to provide clean water to public for free of costs. Although it contain heavy funding but the government should prioritize it. Since quality water directly affects the health so it should be easily accessible.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position and providing reasons for the argument. The ideas are relevant, such as the role of government and the economic burden on developing nations. However, the development is somewhat uneven. The second paragraph contains a logical contradiction: you argue that clean water should be free, but then mention that the government could impose a tax, which slightly undermines your initial stance. Additionally, the point about 'less likely hood of consumption of impure water' is unclear and lacks sufficient explanation. To reach a higher band, ensure that your arguments are consistently developed and that your supporting examples directly reinforce your thesis without introducing conflicting ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, each with a clear central topic. You use basic cohesive devices such as 'First of all', 'Secondly', and 'All things considered' to guide the reader. However, the flow within paragraphs is occasionally disrupted by awkward phrasing, such as 'In that case' being used repeatedly in different contexts. Referencing is sometimes mechanical, and the transition between the benefits of free water and the economic reality of funding it could be smoother. To improve, try to vary your linking words and ensure that each sentence logically follows the previous one to create a more cohesive argument.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'purification technology', 'financial crisis', and 'prioritize'. However, there are several instances of imprecise word choice and collocation errors, such as 'another thing to considerate' (should be 'consider'), 'less likely hood' (should be 'likelihood'), and 'free of costs' (should be 'free of cost' or 'at no cost'). Some phrasing is also slightly unnatural, such as 'below average' to describe people's economic status. Expanding your vocabulary to include more precise academic collocations would help elevate your score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader. Examples include 'compared to past now access' (missing punctuation and articles), 'they can't afford to drink mineral water and thus heavily rely on sanitary and impure water' (the use of 'sanitary' here is incorrect as it implies the water is clean), and 'it contain heavy funding' (subject-verb agreement error). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are some missing commas in complex sentences. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and article usage will improve your accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.