Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.5)

Accees when is While clean water is undeniably essential for human survival and dignity, I completely disagree with the idea that households should receive an unlimited water supply entirely free of charge. Providing completely free water to every home is financially unsustainable for governments and encourages widespread wastage of a precious natural resource.

First and foremost, treating and distributing clean water requires substantial financial resources. Purification plants, extensive pipeline infrastructure, and regular maintenance demand ongoing investment. If governments were to bear the entire cost of domestic water consumption, it would place an unsustainable strain on public budgets. As a result, funds would inevitably be diverted from other vital sectors such as public healthcare, public transportation, and education. Charging households a reasonable rate ensures that water supply systems remain self-sustaining and capable of delivering safe, reliable service.

Furthermore, making water completely free would eliminate any financial incentive for conservation. When resources are provided at no cost, consumers tend to take them for granted. Consequently, individuals might leave taps running, neglect household leaks, or use excessive amounts of purified water for non-essential purposes like watering large lawns or filling private swimming pools. In an era marked by climate change and severe droughts, unmetered and free usage would rapidly lead to severe water shortages

In conclusion, although access to clean water is a fundamental right, making domestic water supplies entirely free is an impractical solution. A balanced system that provides a subsidized basic allowance while charging for excess usage is the most effective way to ensure both equitable access and environmental sustainability.to clean water is a basic human right therefore every home should have a water supply have a water supply with of free of charage

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The response fully addresses the prompt by taking a clear position against free water supply. The arguments regarding financial sustainability and the risk of resource wastage are well-developed and logically extended. The student provides relevant examples, such as the maintenance of infrastructure and the potential for misuse in private settings, which effectively support the main argument. The conclusion provides a nuanced alternative, suggesting a subsidized model, which demonstrates a sophisticated engagement with the topic. The inclusion of a repetitive, garbled sentence at the very end of the text is a minor distraction, but the overall task response is strong and focused.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between the financial argument and the conservation argument is smooth. Cohesive devices such as 'First and foremost', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion' are used effectively to guide the reader. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct points. The flow of the argument is natural, and the relationship between ideas is consistently clear throughout the response. The minor repetition at the end does not significantly disrupt the overall logical structure of the essay.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.0

The vocabulary is precise and well-suited to an academic context. The student demonstrates a good range of topic-specific terminology, such as 'financially unsustainable', 'pipeline infrastructure', 'self-sustaining', and 'equitable access'. The use of collocations is generally accurate, and the tone remains formal throughout. While there are no highly ambitious or idiomatic expressions, the language is natural and conveys the intended meaning with clarity and precision. The minor error at the end of the text is likely a transcription issue rather than a lack of lexical range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.0

The essay displays a good variety of complex sentence structures, including conditional clauses ('If governments were to bear...') and concessive clauses ('Although access to clean water is a fundamental right...'). The majority of sentences are error-free, and the control over punctuation and grammar is generally high. There are very few grammatical slips, and the meaning is never obscured. The final sentence, which appears to be a garbled repetition of the introduction, is an outlier that does not reflect the high standard of the rest of the writing, but it does not prevent the essay from being highly readable.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.