Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In modern society, people are more concerned about their health and well-being. They follows a balanced diet and drink only filtered water to stay safe from infection. However, clean water is a human's basic necessity. It is often argue that each house have a free water supply service. I am not agree with this. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will discuss my opinion on this.

To commence with, providing free water service to the public creates unnecessary financial burden on the government as substantial funds required to maintain the water supply infrastructure. Moreover, the service is provided equally to low-income, unemployed, and wealthy individuals, regardless of their financial status, which means that even those who can afford to pay for water receive the same benefits. For example, a wealthy businessman who pays to several employee, will definitely not face any financial barrier to pay. However, it will be a relief for a low-salaried or unemployed person who may struggle to meet basic living expenses.

In addition, people often use this facility casually, which can lead to unnecessary water wastage. They don't bother about the water conservation and use this leverage as a basic human right. When people have to pay for water service they closely monitor how much they have consumed. For instance, households that receive unlimited free water may leave taps running while washing cars or watering gardens, which can result in excessive water consumption.

In conclusion, free cost for water supply is somehow human basic right as they contributed to nation in several ways in the form of taxes. However, free of cost water supply places significant economic pressure on the government and nevertheless people take leverage to use excessive water without even monitoring the usage of water.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by clearly stating a position against free water supply. The ideas are relevant, focusing on economic burden and water wastage. However, the development is somewhat limited. While the argument regarding government costs is clear, the counter-argument in the conclusion—that water is a human right—is introduced too late and contradicts the earlier stance without being fully integrated or reconciled. To achieve a higher band, you should ensure that all aspects of the prompt are explored in the body paragraphs rather than introducing new, conflicting ideas in the conclusion. The position is consistent, but the depth of analysis could be improved by providing more nuanced examples.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'To commence with', 'Moreover', and 'In addition' are used to guide the reader through the argument. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical, and there are minor issues with referencing, such as the phrase 'this leverage' in the third paragraph, which is slightly imprecise. Overall, the progression of ideas is clear, and the essay maintains a coherent flow throughout.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task. You use some topic-specific terms like 'infrastructure', 'financial burden', and 'water conservation'. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'free cost for water supply' (should be 'free water supply') and 'pays to several employee' (should be 'employs several people'). The range is sufficient to convey your meaning, but there is a lack of more sophisticated or idiomatic language that would be required for a higher band score. Improving your control over collocations will help enhance your lexical precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('They follows', 'each house have', 'water is a human's basic necessity') and incorrect verb forms ('It is often argue', 'I am not agree'). While these errors do not impede communication, they are persistent throughout the text. To improve, focus on basic subject-verb agreement and ensuring that passive voice constructions are formed correctly. Increasing the variety of error-free complex sentences will also help improve your score in this criterion.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.