Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-29
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Water is a essential natural resource of human body, without water there is no life. By living in this earth, it is a human right to access clean water for drinking. I am agree with this notion for which I will depicts light on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
At the outset, there are convincing factors which are in the favour of availability of clean water, the first and the foremost point is that drinking water is a necessity of life, whereas drinking proper clear water is more essential for a good health. Without clean water people can suffer several diseases like infection, jaundice etcetera. Moreover, impure water can also leads to infectious insects like plasmodium, which can cause serve diseases. In addition to this, clean and pure water is also essential for cooking and maintaining hygiene. For a better civilization and better health pure free water is crucial.
Moving towards rest of information, the noteworthy point is that water treatments and managing pure water is expensive. Poor families may struggle to get clear water. For instance, Delhi is the city in which clear water bottle is very expensive and water bills are also very expensive, which a low-class family cannot afford. So, providing a basic supply free of cost can support a low household income. Moreover, government can reduce pressure on healthcare y providing free approach to clean water. It can also improve the nation`s wealth and health of individuals.
In conclusion, without a doubt it can be said that their are multifarious beneficial reasons of providing free of cost pure water as a human right.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. The arguments regarding health benefits and economic accessibility are relevant and supported by examples, such as the mention of Delhi. However, the development is somewhat limited; the essay could be improved by exploring the counter-argument (e.g., the feasibility of providing free water for all, or the potential for waste if it is not priced) to provide a more balanced and nuanced discussion. While the position is clear, the depth of analysis remains at a basic level, preventing a higher score.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear central topic. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'At the outset', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical or awkward, such as 'Moving towards rest of information'. Additionally, the referencing is occasionally unclear, and the flow between sentences could be smoother. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, body, and conclusion, which provides a coherent structure overall.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey their ideas clearly. There are some attempts to use less common vocabulary, such as 'multifarious' and 'noteworthy', though some word choices are imprecise or slightly unnatural, such as 'depicts light on' (should be 'shed light on') and 'infectious insects' (insects are vectors, not infectious themselves). Spelling is generally accurate, but the range of vocabulary is somewhat limited, relying on repetitive phrasing in certain sections.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader, such as 'I am agree' (I agree), 'can also leads to' (can also lead to), and 'their are' (there are). Punctuation is generally functional, though some errors in article usage and subject-verb agreement persist. While the meaning is rarely obscured, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band score. More attention to basic verb forms and article usage is needed.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.