Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

It is often argued that people should not be charged for using clean water as its usage is their fundamental human right. I completely agree with the given statement although some people argue against it.

The primary reason to support my view is that implementing fees for allowing users to use clean water may result in financial difficulties especially among those from lower and middle class backgrounds. While people from rich background can afford paying, ones from lower financial backgrounds would struggle if they have to pay for it. Therefore, in order to protect these people from financial burden, they should be provided with a water supply at no cost. Another significant aspect worth considering is that in many parts of the world, it is considered against ethics and morals to prevent people, who need clean water for any purposes, from using it. This is particularly evident in Asian countries such as India and Sri Lanka where a water supply is provided free of charge.

Conversely, proponents argue that providing water at no cost may result in its excessive usage. This can ultimately lead to water waste and even its scarcity. However, such problems can be addressed by the governments through several effective measures. For example, conducting public awareness campaigns could encourage people to use it appropriately. Moreover, implementing strict rules and regulations against those who use water excessively can prevent such issues.

Overall, although some people are concerned that providing a free water supply may result in water waste and its shortage, implementation of charges is not an effective solution. Instead, it can be tackled effectively through the governments' alternative methods.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, maintaining a clear position throughout. The arguments regarding financial accessibility and ethical considerations are relevant and well-supported. The counter-argument is acknowledged and effectively refuted, demonstrating a balanced approach. The ideas are extended with specific examples, such as the mention of India and Sri Lanka, which adds depth to the argument. The conclusion effectively summarises the main points and reinforces the writer's stance. The response is well-focused and meets the requirements of the task effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organised with a clear progression of ideas. Paragraphing is used effectively to separate the introduction, supporting arguments, counter-argument, and conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'The primary reason', 'Conversely', and 'Moreover' are used appropriately to link sentences and paragraphs. While the flow is generally smooth, some transitions could be more sophisticated to enhance the overall cohesion. The referencing is clear, and the structure supports the development of the argument without any significant lapses in logic.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is sufficient for the task and allows for some precision. The student uses relevant terms such as 'fundamental human right', 'financial burden', 'excessive usage', and 'public awareness campaigns'. There are occasional instances where word choice could be more natural, such as 'ones from lower financial backgrounds' or 'against ethics and morals'. However, the range is adequate to convey the intended meaning clearly, and there are no spelling errors that impede communication. To reach a higher band, the student should aim for more sophisticated collocations and idiomatic expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There is good control over grammar, and most sentences are error-free. However, there are minor inaccuracies, such as 'afford paying' (should be 'afford to pay') and 'against ethics and morals' (should be 'unethical'). Punctuation is generally accurate, and the errors present do not impede communication. The student shows a good grasp of complex structures, but further variety and more consistent accuracy in verb patterns would elevate the score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.