Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.5)

Access to clean water is essential for human survival, and many people believe that every household should receive a free water supply. I agree with this view because clean water is necessary for a healthy life, although its use should be controlled to prevent unnecessary wastage.

First of all, clean water is fundamental to human health and hygiene. People need water for drinking, cooking, bathing and cleaning. If families cannot afford a sufficient supply of safe water, they may be forced to use contaminated sources, which can cause serious diseases. For this reason, governments should ensure that every household has access to a basic amount of clean water, regardless of its financial situation.

Another important reason is that free access to water can support disadvantaged families. Low-income households often struggle to pay for essential necessities such as food, electricity and healthcare. Providing a basic water supply without charge would reduce their financial burden and allow them to maintain proper hygiene. Nevertheless, free water should not mean unlimited consumption. If people do not have to pay for excessive usage, they may waste this valuable resource. Therefore, governments could provide a certain amount of water free of charge and charge households for consumption beyond this limit.

In conclusion, I agree that every home should have access to a basic supply of clean water free of charge because it is vital for health, hygiene and human well-being. However, charging for excessive consumption would be an effective way to prevent wastage and encourage people to use water responsibly.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The response fully addresses all parts of the prompt. You clearly state your position in the introduction and maintain it throughout the essay. The ideas are well-developed, particularly the distinction between basic human rights and the need to prevent wastage through tiered pricing. You provide logical reasons for your stance, such as health benefits and financial support for low-income families. The argument is balanced and directly answers the question posed. The conclusion effectively synthesises your main points without introducing new information. Overall, the response is focused, relevant, and demonstrates a clear understanding of the task requirements.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The essay is logically organised with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, starting with health, moving to financial support, and concluding with a balanced summary. You use cohesive devices effectively, such as 'First of all', 'Another important reason', 'Nevertheless', and 'Therefore', which guide the reader smoothly through your argument. The paragraphing is appropriate, and the relationship between sentences is clear. There is no evidence of mechanical or repetitive use of linking words. The structure is coherent and supports the development of your argument well.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.0

You demonstrate a sufficient range of vocabulary to discuss the topic with precision. Phrases like 'contaminated sources', 'financial burden', 'unlimited consumption', and 'valuable resource' show a good command of topic-specific language. The vocabulary is natural and appropriate for an academic context. While the range is not exceptionally wide or sophisticated, it is precise and allows for clear communication of your ideas. There are no noticeable errors in word choice or collocation, and the language used is consistently accurate throughout the response.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5

The essay displays a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures. You use conditional sentences ('If families cannot afford...', 'If people do not have to pay...') and relative clauses effectively. The grammar is highly accurate, with almost no errors in tense, subject-verb agreement, or punctuation. The majority of your sentences are error-free, demonstrating a strong command of English syntax. While the range of structures is not highly complex, it is sufficient to convey your arguments clearly and professionally. The writing is fluent and easy to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.