Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

There is a growing discussion about including clean water as part of basic human rights, therefore every household should be entitled to free clean water supply. Personally, I completely disagree with this view because it will lead to inappropriate use of water and lack of efficiency in maintaining it.

The main reason For my view is because people will not manage water properly. This means when free water becomes human basic right, people won't value the importance, so they tend to waste it. In other words, when people do not pay for wholesome water they tend to use it for all kinds of activities instead of using it for cooking and drinking only. For instance, In Nigeria people pay the government for wholesome water supply, instead of using this water to wash clothes, flushing toilets and do some minor house chores they will rather use a well water because they know the financial value of wholesome water.

Another major reason why I hold this position is because of adequate maintenance. If governments are left to take charge of financial cost involved in producing a clean water, it will lead to inadequate water supply. Although government should be responsible for all these, there are other social amenities that need more attention. Therefore, if the public want to enjoy a regular clean water supply, they need to render some extend of financial supports. For example, in most estates in Nigeria, they usually enjoy regular tap water supply because they pay for the maintenance.

In conclusion, I Firmly disagree that clean water should be free for people to use because it will result in wastage of clean water and poor maintenances.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

You have clearly stated your position against the provision of free water and maintained this stance throughout the essay. You provide two distinct, relevant arguments: the risk of water wastage and the necessity of funding for infrastructure maintenance. The examples provided, particularly the reference to Nigerian estates, help illustrate your points effectively. To reach a higher band, ensure that your arguments are fully developed; for instance, you could briefly acknowledge the counter-argument regarding the 'human right' aspect mentioned in the prompt to show a more balanced, critical perspective before refuting it. Overall, the response is well-focused and addresses all parts of the task.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the progression of ideas is easy to follow. You use some cohesive devices such as 'In other words', 'For instance', and 'Therefore' to link your thoughts. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical or repetitive. To improve, try to vary your linking words and ensure that referencing (e.g., 'these', 'this') is always precise to avoid ambiguity. Paragraphing is used appropriately, which helps the reader navigate your argument.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'wholesome water', 'social amenities', and 'financial supports'. There are some minor issues with word choice and collocation, such as 'render some extend of financial supports' (should be 'extent') and 'wholesome water' (which is slightly unnatural in this context; 'potable' or 'treated' water is more common). While you successfully convey your meaning, the vocabulary is generally functional rather than sophisticated. Incorporating more precise academic collocations would help elevate your score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While your meaning is always clear, there are frequent minor errors in grammar and punctuation. Examples include 'the main reason For my view is because' (unnecessary capitalization and redundant phrasing), 'human basic right' (missing article 'a'), and 'if the public want' (subject-verb agreement: 'wants'). Additionally, there are some awkward phrasings like 'do some minor house chores they will rather use a well water'. Despite these errors, they do not impede communication, and you show a reasonable level of control over sentence construction.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.