Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

water is very crucial component for survial of life . Almost 70 percent human body reliy on water usage. I firmly agree that approcah of pure water is an important human right, so that each home needs a supply of water without of cost.

I mendate that, every single individual have the basic human right to get the free accecibility of water .in that present era pure water is the main indicatore to survive long lasting life. human use water in every field of life like they use water to make foods, it use in home cleaning , washing clothes and bathing . if they pay water charges to the suppliers, it would be too expensive for every single house. No one can pay the charges and they use unfiltred water for survival which leads towards the diseses that affect the body organs. Moreover survival of human life would be difficult.

In addition if I talk about the charges of water ,our goverment should give the free of cost water to every home so that they can suvrive easily and perfoem their daily routine life. govermnat needs to make the dramatic system to get pure water like they should provide free hand pumpe of dispensers so that everyone can get clean water in thir home . If the home users use clean water they can survive for a long duration of time without cayse of any diseses .it is very comon need for every home .

In conclusion, i am heartedly agree that water is a basic involment for human right and every single body oermanently relay on water to perform whole life ,additionally it would be provided on the base of zero charges so that we can easily take breat peacfully.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of free water access. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. While you mention the health benefits and the financial burden on households, the arguments lack depth and specific examples. The essay tends to over-generalize, and the reasoning regarding government implementation (e.g., 'dramatic system' and 'free hand pumpe') is underdeveloped. To improve, you should focus on providing more nuanced arguments, such as the economic implications for governments or the distinction between basic survival needs and luxury usage, to better support your position throughout the essay.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. For example, 'I mendate that' and 'In addition if I talk about' are awkward transitions. The progression of ideas is sometimes hindered by repetitive phrasing, such as the constant restatement that water is a basic human right. While there is an attempt to use linking words like 'Moreover' and 'In conclusion', the overall flow is occasionally disjointed, and the referencing (e.g., 'it use in home cleaning') is sometimes unclear.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is limited and often repetitive, relying on basic terms like 'water', 'home', and 'survive'. There are frequent spelling errors, such as 'survial', 'reliy', 'approcah', 'accecibility', 'indicatore', 'diseses', 'suvrive', and 'pumpe'. These errors, combined with awkward collocations like 'dramatic system' and 'take breat peacfully', occasionally impede the reader's understanding. To reach a higher band, you need to expand your vocabulary to include more precise, academic terminology related to public policy and human rights, and pay closer attention to accurate spelling and word formation.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay relies heavily on simple sentence structures, and attempts at complex sentences are frequently marred by grammatical errors. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'every single individual have', 'goverment should give'), missing articles, and incorrect preposition usage. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with spaces missing before periods and commas. While the meaning is generally conveyed, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and sentence construction prevents the text from reaching a higher level. Focusing on sentence variety and proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy would significantly improve your score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.