Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In this globalised era, without any qualms, it is accepted that access to clean water is a fundamental human necessity and a basic right for everyone. Some people contend that households should be provided with an unlimited water supply completely free of charge. However, I debunk from this view and proffer that although every individual should have access to clean water, providing unlimited water free of charge is neither practical nor beneficial.

Compelling evidences are obtainable to demonstrate the notion of ensuring universal access to clean water. The paramount concrete reason is that clean water is essential for maintaining public health and preventing waterborne diseases. To go hand in hand, a superlative rationale which drags me to persist is that poor families may struggle to afford a sufficient supply of safe water. The subsequent feature which is incontestable to be accounted is that governments have a moral responsibility to ensure that nobody is deprived of this basic necessity. To uphold my article of faith, I would jot down an illustration of low-income communities, where providing affordable or free water can significantly improve people's health and living standards.

What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others, so the public across the board discriminate that providing water completely free of charge to every household is impractical, which has myriad of reasons. To commence with, some people reckon that unlimited free water could encourage unnecessary consumption and lead to considerable wastage, whilst they also justify that governments would have to bear enormous costs for water treatment, infrastructure and maintenance.

To synopsize, I pen down saying that there are innumerable robust factors underpinning the fact that clean water should be accessible to everyone, particularly disadvantaged people. Ergo, its contrary can be overlooked or curbed. Consequently, I firmly disagree with the statement that every household should receive an unlimited water supply completely free of charge, although governments should guarantee affordable access to clean water for all.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, maintaining a clear position throughout. You effectively balance the argument by acknowledging the importance of water as a human right while providing logical reasons why universal free supply is impractical. The ideas are well-developed, particularly the points regarding resource wastage and government financial burden. To reach a higher band, ensure that your supporting examples are more specific; for instance, instead of mentioning 'low-income communities' in general, you could refer to a specific region or a well-known water management policy to add depth to your argument.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, supporting arguments, counter-arguments, and conclusion. You use a variety of cohesive devices such as 'To commence with', 'To synopsize', and 'Consequently'. However, some transitions feel slightly forced or unnatural, such as 'To go hand in hand' and 'To uphold my article of faith'. Improving the natural flow of these linking phrases would enhance the overall coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate a good range of vocabulary, attempting to use sophisticated items like 'proffer', 'incontestable', and 'myriad'. However, there are instances of unnatural word choice and collocation errors. For example, 'I debunk from this view' is not standard English; 'I disagree with this view' or 'I refute this notion' would be more appropriate. Similarly, 'discriminate' is used incorrectly in the context of 'the public... discriminate that', where 'argue' or 'contend' would be better. Focus on using vocabulary that you are confident fits the specific context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While you attempt complex grammatical forms, there are frequent errors that occasionally affect the precision of your meaning. For instance, 'Compelling evidences are obtainable' is grammatically incorrect as 'evidence' is an uncountable noun. Additionally, phrases like 'the public across the board discriminate that' contain awkward phrasing. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. Focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct usage of uncountable nouns to improve your accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.