Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Access to water without any impurities is an essential human necessity, and some people argue that it should be supplied to every household free of charge. I strongly associate with this view because clean water is fundamental to public health and should not be determine by a person's financial circumstance.

The primary reason for providing free water is that it is indispensable for maintaining basic health and hygiene. Civilians need clean water for drinking, cooking, bathing and sanitation, meaning it is not a luxury and therefore should not be deprived to those who cannot afford it. If households were required to pay substational amounts for thier basic water needs, low-income and middle class families might reduce their consumption, potentially resulting in poor hygiene and the spread of waterborne diseases. For example, providing acess to safe water in disadvantaged and low economical communities could significantly reduce illnesses caused by contaminated sources.

Furthermore, treating clean water as a basic right can help eradicate social inequality. Wealthier households can easily afford essential utilities, whereas poorer families may have to choose between water bill and other necessities such as food or medicine. Governments therefore have a responsibility to ensure that every citizen has access to a safe and adequate supply which only they should bear. This does not interpret that unlimited water should be free; rather, a reasonable basic allowance could be forsaken without any additional charge, while excessive consumption could still be paid for.

In conclusion, I firmly stand with the ideology that every household should have free water access to a basic amount as this would protect public health and promote greater social equality.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The response clearly addresses the prompt and maintains a consistent position throughout. The arguments regarding public health and social inequality are relevant and well-developed. The student provides a nuanced view by suggesting a 'reasonable basic allowance' rather than unlimited free water, which demonstrates a sophisticated approach to the task. The ideas are extended with logical reasoning, such as the link between cost and hygiene. The response fully satisfies the requirements of the task by presenting a clear argument supported by relevant points.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the progression of ideas is smooth. Cohesive devices such as 'The primary reason', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion' are used effectively to guide the reader. Referencing is generally clear, and the paragraphing is appropriate. The flow of the argument is consistent, and the relationship between the ideas is easy to follow, making the text coherent throughout.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The student demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, including terms like 'indispensable', 'sanitation', 'eradicate', and 'ideology'. While there are minor errors such as 'substational' (spelling), 'thier' (spelling), and 'acess' (spelling), these do not impede communication. The use of 'low economical communities' is slightly awkward, as 'economically disadvantaged' would be more precise. Overall, the vocabulary is sufficient to convey complex ideas with some flexibility, though a few more precise collocations would elevate the score further.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures effectively. There are some grammatical slips, such as 'should not be determine' (should be 'determined') and 'This does not interpret that' (should be 'This does not mean that'). However, the majority of sentences are error-free, and the control of complex structures is generally good. Punctuation is used correctly, and the errors present are minor and do not cause any difficulty for the reader. The grammatical range is adequate for the task.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.