Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Water is the fundamental part of every living organism. It true that water supply should be totally chargeless for the human. From my perspective, i partially agree with the statement. I shall discuss both the reasons and examples in the following paragraph.

To commence with, water is the major requirement for every human for survival purpose, If government starts to take charges on the water then it directly affects the poor community. Furthermore everyone knows that without water no one can live, Moreover, people will starting to fight for the basic need and it will made major concern for the nation. Water is not only used for the surviving purpose but also integral for the daily routine work. As consequently, free water can solve our immence problems and it helps to live smooth life for both poor and rich community that ultimately lead to maintain calmness in the society.

On the contrary, globe is also suffering from the threat of the limited supply of the water. People are not understanding the vlaue of the water and use it like their own property. Sweet water supply is extremely less across the world, therefor basic charge can be apply on the any type of water whether, it is drinking water or washing water, so people can understand the global issue and it is good approach for the next generation. Also government can take action to preserve the drinkable water as well rain water for reuse.

In conclusion, government should take steps to retain the pure water and arrange campaign to aware people for betterment of upcoming generation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by taking a partial stance on whether water should be free for every home. The student presents arguments for both sides, suggesting that free water helps impoverished communities avoid conflict, while also arguing that charging a basic fee encourages conservation and resource preservation. However, the ideas are somewhat generalized and lack fully elaborated supporting examples. For instance, the mention of people fighting over basic needs is stated without real-world context. Despite these limitations in depth, the core requirements of the prompt are covered, and a clear, albeit basic, position is maintained throughout the essay. This performance aligns best with the Band 6 descriptors.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay has a coherent overall arrangement with a recognizable introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The student attempts to use standard cohesive markers, such as 'To commence with', 'Furthermore', and 'On the contrary'. However, referencing and transitions are at times mechanical or slightly awkward, as seen in 'As consequently, free water can solve our immence problems'. Paragraphing is used correctly to separate the opposing viewpoints, but logical progression within the paragraphs occasionally feels disjointed due to run-on sentences and punctuation issues. Overall, the organizational structure is adequate to earn a solid Band 6.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the student to communicate basic points about water preservation and human rights. However, there are notable spelling errors ('chargeless', 'immence', 'theredor', 'vlaue') and unnatural word choices, such as 'sweet water' instead of 'fresh water' and 'surviving purpose' instead of 'survival'. While the student attempts some less common phrasing, inaccuracies in collocation and word form prevent the response from reaching a higher band. The lexical range is minimally sufficient, making this a clear Band 5.5 performance, rounded to 5.5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The student demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, though attempts at complexity frequently contain grammatical slips. There are noticeable errors with subject-verb agreement, articles, and clause structures, such as 'It true that water supply should be totally chargeless', 'people will starting to fight', and 'basic charge can be apply on the any type of water'. Punctuation is also problematic, with several comma splices and run-on sentences, such as 'water is the major requirement for every human for survival purpose, If government starts...'. Despite these frequent errors, the meaning remains mostly clear to the reader, fitting the Band 5 descriptors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.