Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Polluted water has become a widely debated issue in recent years. While some people believe that dirty water is dangerous for human health. I strongly agree with the statement because harmful water causes many diseases and disturbs the whole system of our body.
The main reason why i agree is that the polluted water in our sewage system causes many diseases when you drink it and used it for other purposes. This is because in our environment from children to the elderly every person is targeted by a lot of diseases like Cholera, Typhoid, etc. This clearly shows that when we are targeted by the any type of disease, so our body health is affected by this type of diseases. Therefore, takes some action against government members for our social rights like access to clean water.
Another significant reason is that the government workers did not work on this issue and always take money from the government but did not work on this human right problem. In other words, we takes an action against this main issue and solve it in the next few months. A good example of this we can seen in the neighbourhood countries where every government worker does his work by heart and full of intention. As a result, people of every age have a smart and fit and performs our daily work with full intention.
In conclusion, i completely agree that the main point which is that the access to clean water is a basic human right. This is mainly because it is a basic right of every community members and it want to the peoples. At the end, the one more human right is that authorities should take an action against our workers and gives a free of charge water supply for the residents.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear, strong position that clean water is a basic human right and should be provided free of charge, as seen in the statement "I strongly agree with the statement because harmful water causes many diseases." The main ideas regarding health impacts and government responsibilities are introduced, but they lack sufficient extension and deep support. While the student mentions diseases like Cholera and Typhoid, the arguments regarding government workers and the comparison to neighbouring countries are underdeveloped and somewhat confused, leading to over-generalisation. Furthermore, there is a minor shift in focus towards blaming government workers rather than directly addressing the economic or logistical feasibility of free water supply. Consequently, this performance fits the Band 5 descriptors where ideas are somewhat limited and under-developed, though the prompt is generally addressed.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The response is organised into paragraphs, with each paragraph attempting to focus on a central theme, such as health consequences in paragraph two and government responsibility in paragraph three. However, the overall progression is frequently disrupted by awkward transitions and unclear referencing. For instance, phrases like "This is because in our environment from children to the elderly every person is targeted" and "In other words, we takes an action against this main issue" create mechanical and faulty cohesion. Pronoun referencing is also problematic, as seen in sentences where it is unclear what "it want to the peoples" refers to. Paragraphing is present, but internal logical links are weak, placing the response firmly at Band 5.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is generally basic and repetitive, with frequent limitations that restrict precision. The student successfully uses common topic-related words such as "polluted water," "disease," "Cholera," and "Typhoid." However, attempts to use less common vocabulary often result in awkward word choices, inappropriate collocations, or unnatural phrasing, such as "disturbs the whole system of our body," "does his work by heart and full of intention," and "neighbourhood countries." There are also issues with word forms, for example, "when you drink it and used it." These noticeable lexical errors and the limited range place the response at Band 5.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but attempts at complex structures are frequently faulty. There are persistent grammatical errors throughout the text, particularly with verb tense consistency, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions. Examples include "when we are targeted by the any type of disease, so our body health is affected," "we takes an action," and "gives a free of charge water supply." The sentence "A good example of this we can seen in the neighbourhood countries where every government worker does his work..." illustrates structural confusion. These frequent errors cause some difficulty for the reader and align with the Band 5 descriptor for grammatical range and accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.