Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Water is a basic human necessity. Without water, no one on earth can survive. Therefore, Access to clean water is a right of every human being, but I disagree that it should be completely free of cost for every home.

There is no doubt access to clean water is a fundamental human right. Water is very important for our survival, just like air, and without safe drinking water, people suffer from serious health problems such as chlorea and typhoid. For example, In many rural area of Pakistan, families are forced to drink contaminated water, which leads to serious diseases. Furthermore, if clean water is too much expensive, the poorest member of society will be unable to afford it, which creates inequality and social injustice. For this reason, Government have a moral obligation to ensure that every citizen can access portable water.

However, I completely disagree with the idea that water should be provided free of charge to every home without limit. Firstly, if the water is free, people will not save it and wastage will increase dramatically. For Instance, People may leave tap running or use excessive water for washing cars and gardens. Secondly, treating and distributing water is extremely expensive. The Government has to build filteration plants, maintain pipelines, and pay staff, which costs billion of rupees. If no revenue is generated, this will become an unbearable financial burden on the state and it can also effect our economy. The basic solution would be to provide a basic allowance. For example, 50 liter per person per day, and then charge for any extra consumption.

In conclusion, Although clean water is very beneficial for human, but making it entirely free of cost is impractical and will lead to water wastage and funancial burden.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The student addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position on whether clean water should be free. The introduction states the writer's stance directly, and both body paragraphs present well-supported arguments. The first body paragraph explores the human rights perspective and societal risks, while the second examines the economic implications and consequences of unchecked waste. The ideas are extended effectively with relevant examples, such as the mention of water scarcity in rural Pakistan and the practical solution of a basic allowance. The response fully satisfies the requirements of Band 7, as a clear position is maintained throughout with adequately developed ideas, though the conclusion contains a minor grammatical slip.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay displays clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct central topic, moving smoothly from the introduction to the human rights argument, the counter-argument regarding costs and waste, and finally to a concise conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore', 'However', 'Firstly', and 'Secondly' are used effectively to guide the reader through the writer's reasoning. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas. Although cohesion is generally managed well, occasional slightly mechanical transitions prevent it from reaching a higher band. Overall, the structural flow is coherent and easy to follow, aligning closely with Band 7 descriptors.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate to sufficient range of vocabulary for the task. Words and phrases such as 'fundamental human right', 'contaminated water', 'financial burden', and 'excessive consumption' show a good grasp of topic-specific language. Less common lexical items are attempted with some awareness of style, though there are minor inaccuracies in word choice and spelling, such as 'chlorea' instead of 'cholera', 'portable' instead of 'potable', and 'funancial' instead of 'financial'. Despite these occasional errors, the vocabulary is varied enough to allow precise communication of ideas, fitting comfortably within the criteria for a Band 6.5 or solid Band 6 performance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay features a healthy mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including conditional clauses ('if clean water is too much expensive...') and relative clauses. There is good control over punctuation for the most part. However, a number of grammatical errors persist, such as article omissions ('Access to clean water', 'Government have'), incorrect prepositions or modifiers ('too much expensive'), and subject-verb agreement issues ('it can also effect' instead of 'affect'). While these errors are noticeable, they rarely impede communication, allowing the reader to follow the arguments without confusion. This balance of complex structures alongside recurring minor errors reflects the standard of a Band 6 performance.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.