Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-23
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In these contamprory era when access to pure drinking water is fundamental right of human and well-being. While, other concluide that government should provide free of charge water to every household. I firmly oppose that because it create financial burden on government and affect on environment. My preference would be discussed furher.
One major drawback is it significant impact on environment. Water is limited natural resource. If it would be zero of charge so every citizen use without any cocern. They largely waste on housechore,wash the car, serve water on plant. They have no fear to restriction of water. And in nearest time water sortage will be create. Additionally, for govenment economical decline occured. Water tax money shoud be invest in better health care and education. And also the cost of filteration of water, purification is a considerable amount. We not accecible for other facilities like better infrastructre.
On the other hand, it is indispatable that clean water is basic essancial for all person. Not only provide zero cost but also authorities ought to supply few amount of charge for under priviladge peoples. And for wealthy water charge is mandatory. Other individual use it in infrastructre, clening and use unnecessarly. But provide in budget friendly price .
Taking everything into account, it is not deniable that water is basic human need but with free of charge it is completely negative . Negative affect on both environmentally and also economically. Citizen use is unnecessary without any bother. Moreover, for poor water is affordable.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The student addresses the prompt by clearly taking a stance against free household water supply, citing financial and environmental concerns. The position is maintained throughout the response, and relevant ideas such as resource depletion and government expenditure are introduced. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited and lacks robust supporting examples. Sentences like 'Water tax money shoud be invest in better health care' touch on valid points, but the argumentation remains underdeveloped in places. The conclusion reiterates the main stance, fulfilling the core requirements of the task adequately. These characteristics align best with a Band 5.5 to 6.0 descriptor, where relevant ideas are present but require deeper extension and clearer support.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The essay is divided into distinct paragraphs, showing an attempt at logical organisation. The introduction sets out the background and stance, followed by body paragraphs discussing environmental and economic aspects. However, overall progression is frequently hindered by awkward transitions, referencing errors, and repetitive phrasing, such as 'Negative affect on both environmentally and also economically'. Cohesive devices are used mechanically and sometimes inaccurately (e.g., 'While, other concluide...'). Paragraphing is present, but internal cohesion fails to create a smooth, logical flow. These issues reflect Band 5.0, where organisation is visible, but clear overall progression is lacking due to faulty and repetitive cohesive devices.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The student attempts less common vocabulary, such as 'contamprory', 'fundamental', and 'filteration', but spelling errors and word choice inaccuracies are frequent throughout the response. Words are often used with incorrect grammatical forms or collocations, such as 'zero of charge', 'housechore', and 'under priviladge peoples'. These lexical slips and spelling mistakes ('sortage', 'govenment', 'indispatable', 'essancial') occasionally strain the reader's comprehension, although the general meaning remains retrievable. This performance is characteristic of Band 5.0, featuring a limited and minimally adequate range with noticeable errors in spelling and word choice that cause some difficulty.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0
The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but grammatical accuracy is very weak. There are frequent, persistent errors in subject-verb agreement, tense usage, prepositions, and sentence fragments (e.g., 'If it would be zero of charge so every citizen use without any cocern', 'We not accecible for other facilities', 'Not only provide zero cost but also...'). Many complex sentences are faulty and obscure meaning, requiring the reader to re-read to understand the intended message. These widespread errors throughout most sentences place this response firmly in Band 4.0, where errors are frequent and significantly impede communication.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.