Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Clean water is an essential necessity for human life, and everyone should have access to it. Therefore, some people argue that water should be supplied to every household free of charge. I completely agree with this view because it is vital for public health and ensures equal access to a basic human need.

First and foremost, public health, clean water is a crucial needs for all comunitty because good and healthy health, while If people have to buy water and are financially weak, they cannot get enough clean water. Goverment can provided free of charge clean water so poor and rich both are people same way to achive water. For example, if governments provide free drinking water to low-income households, people can maintain better hygiene and reduce the risk of waterborne diseases.

Secondly, free water supplies can ensure equal access to this essential resource. People from low-income backgrounds may not be able to afford sufficient water for their daily needs. For instance, providing free water to every household can help disadvantaged families meet their basic needs without financial pressure. Moreover, free water supplies can reduce the financial burden on poor families. They can use their savings for essential needs, such as food and education. For example, low-income households can spend the money saved on water bills on their children's school expenses.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that clean water should be provided free of charge to every household because it is essential for public health and ensures equal access to a basic human necessity

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt directly by taking a clear and consistent position in agreement with the statement that water should be provided free of charge. The main ideas, focusing on public health and equal access for low-income households, are relevant and supported with explanations and examples, such as reducing waterborne diseases and freeing up funds for education. However, the development in the second paragraph is slightly repetitive and contains phrasing that weakens the argument's depth. Overall, the task is addressed well, matching the requirements for a Band 6.5 or 7.0. Because the ideas are relevant and well-supported despite minor development limitations, it comfortably earns a Band 6.5.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay presents a clear overall progression and logical structure, making effective use of standard organisational markers such as 'First and foremost', 'Secondly', and 'In conclusion'. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct points, with each body paragraph focusing on a specific argument. However, cohesion within sentences is occasionally mechanical or clumsy, as seen in the phrasing 'while If people have to buy water and are financially weak...'. Referencing and logical transitions could be smoother. Despite these minor issues, the writing is easy to follow and meets the descriptors for Band 6.5, leaning towards Band 7.0 for clear overall organization, but limited by occasional awkward connective links.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary range for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'financial burden', 'low-income households', and 'waterborne diseases'. However, there are noticeable word choice and collocation errors, such as 'clean water is a crucial needs for all comunitty' and 'Goverment can provided free of charge clean water so poor and rich both are people same way to achive water'. Spelling errors like 'comunitty' and 'Goverment' also occur. These errors do not seriously impede communication, but they restrict the lexical score to Band 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating attempts at conditional and relative clauses, such as 'if governments provide free drinking water... people can maintain better hygiene'. However, there are frequent grammatical errors and awkward phrasing, including verb form mistakes ('Goverment can provided'), missing articles, and run-on structures ('good and healthy health, while If people have to buy...'). Punctuation is sometimes lacking or incorrect at sentence boundaries. While communication is maintained, the frequency of grammatical inaccuracies places this response firmly at Band 5.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.