Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-23
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
obtain to fresh water is an essential human right.Therefore every home should have a water provision that is giving for free of charge. Portable water is an essential part of human being.I believe that the portable water is a basic part for human health . Firstly, fresh water is an essential part for human right.When, the clean water provided for individuals, it would be safe for health and life.When, the people to take clean water for washing, cooking and drinking they would be safe for any disease.Clean water is benefited for health and growth for individuals.For instance, when the people have to access for fresh water, they would be safe for any kidney disorders. On the other hand, portable water is an essential part of human right.It is the responsibility of government to providing clean water and focus on public health and life.It is providing more and more facilities for getting portable water.Although, the people would be safe for any disease and treatment.In urban areas, the individuals have not to be access for clean water.They emerged in daily life routine and utilize these chemical water . They could not be focus on health and they would be dealt in many diseases.When, the government should taking some steps to improve the water provision and the people utilize these opportunities, they would be safe for health and society. In conclusion, clean water is an important part of the human right.They would be safe for many other diseases, and they better the health.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.0 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The student attempts to address the prompt regarding whether clean water should be provided free of charge, taking a general stance that it is a basic human right and the government's responsibility. However, the development of ideas is limited and repetitive. Throughout the text, phrases such as 'safe for health and disease' are reiterated without introducing new supporting arguments or deep exploration. While the position is discernible, the ideas are under-developed, and the response borders on the lower word count parameters although the requirement is technically met. There is a tendency to over-generalise without providing specific, real-world examples beyond vague references to kidney disorders. These limitations align closely with the Band 5 descriptor, where the task is addressed, but ideas lack sufficient extension and clarity.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response features some organisational structure with basic cohesive devices such as 'Firstly', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion'. However, overall progression is hindered by repetitive phrasing and abrupt transitions. Paragraphing is attempted, but the middle body of the text is dense and lacks logical flow between sentences. Referencing is frequently unclear, as seen in expressions like 'They emerged in daily life routine and utilize these chemical water', where pronoun reference is ambiguous and disrupts the reader's understanding. Cohesive devices are sometimes used inaccurately or mechanically, and the lack of seamless connection between ideas places this response firmly at Band 5.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
The student displays a limited and repetitive vocabulary range, struggling with basic collocations and word forms. Examples include 'obtain to fresh water' instead of 'access to fresh water', 'portable water' instead of 'potable water', and 'giving for free' instead of 'provided free of charge'. There are also frequent lexical errors such as 'chemical water' instead of 'contaminated water' and 'dealt in many diseases' instead of 'afflicted with diseases'. While the meaning can sometimes be guessed from context, the persistent inaccuracies in word choice and spelling significantly impede fluency, restricting the lexical score to a Band 4.5 or 5.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0
The grammatical range is extremely limited, consisting mostly of simple and attempted complex sentences that are consistently flawed. The student demonstrates persistent problems with verb forms, voice, and prepositions. Examples of grammatical errors include 'water provision that is giving', 'the clean water provided for individuals', 'people have to access for fresh water', and 'government should taking some steps'. Complex structures, when attempted, are frequently ungrammatical and obscure the intended meaning. Frequent errors in basic sentence construction cause considerable difficulty for the reader, matching the criteria outlined for Band 4.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.