Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Avaibility to clean water is an essential privilege,consequently doestic residence out to be distributed a water supply service provided with no cost .Access to clean water is an essential for survival , leading many to argue that should be universally recognize to as a basic human right .while i agree government must ensure the basic quota baseline amount of clean water to ensure the basic human rights and public health.i strongly disagree unlimited usage of water is comelety free .

on the one side,government must provide the clean water to every citizen is the moral obligation of any civilized society .water is fundamental for health ,sanetation ,and disease prevention .if a minimum amount of water is provided with charges to drink,cook,for basic hygine impoverished families forsed to rely on a contiminated sources.which can leads to waterborne disease like cholera ,ultimately burdens to the public healthcare system.

on the other side ,rendering water entirely without any restriction and cost can directly affects the enviornment and economy country .if any resource is provided for free ,The lack consumers is financial incentive to coserve it .axcessively use of water without any charges causes some widespreads wastes,such as leaving taps running ,neglecting plumbing leakes ,or watterung to lawns .

if govt do no charge to high volume of consumers ultimatly the utilities become unsustainable .

in conclusion,i believe that tiering pricing system is equitable solution.and government should provides the mi imum amount of water with no charges for the basic human rights and public health.however the consumptions of these basic threshhold should be meterd and taxed.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The student addresses all parts of the prompt by taking a nuanced position that free water should be provided only up to a basic threshold, while excessive usage should be charged. The main ideas are generally relevant and extended, such as discussing public health, disease prevention, and environmental conservation. However, there are instances where the development is slightly curtailed by abrupt phrasing and grammatical disruptions, for example, 'if govt do no charge to high volume of consumers ultimatly the utilities become unsustainable.' Despite these limitations, the position is clear throughout and the core arguments are sufficiently explored, aligning well with the Band 6 descriptor criteria for addressing all parts of the task with relevant ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs representing opposing views, and a concluding synthesis. Paragraphing is used logically to separate the arguments. However, cohesion is frequently faulty or mechanical, as seen in the phrasing 'on the one side' and 'on the other side', alongside missing transition words and numerous punctuation errors. Referencing and logical progression are sometimes hindered by poor sentence boundaries and run-on structures, such as 'impoverished families forsed to rely on a contiminated sources.which can leads to waterborne disease'. These issues place the response firmly in the Band 5 category for cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student attempts a range of vocabulary suitable for the topic, incorporating terms such as 'sanetation', 'impoverished', 'waterborne disease', and 'tiering pricing system'. However, there is a high frequency of spelling errors and inaccurate word forms throughout the text, including 'Avaibility', 'doestic', 'out' for ought, 'contiminated', 'axcessively', 'watterung', and 'meterd'. These lexical and orthographical errors cause noticeable difficulty for the reader and restrict the range, preventing the response from achieving a higher score. Nonetheless, the vocabulary remains minimally adequate for communicating the main arguments, supporting a Band 5 score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as conditional clauses starting with 'if', but these attempts are frequently faulty. Grammatical errors are pervasive, encompassing missing articles ('is an essential for survival'), incorrect verb forms ('should be universally recognize to'), subject-verb agreement issues, and extensive punctuation mistakes (missing spaces after commas and periods). For instance, 'if a minimum amount of water is provided with charges to drink,cook,for basic hygine impoverished families forsed to rely on a contiminated sources' illustrates severe structural and morphological lapses. These frequent errors cause considerable difficulty for the reader, matching the description for Band 4.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.