Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-25
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 7.0)
people pay taxes
Clean drinkable water is one of the basic humans rights that no one should need to fight or pay for. Every home should have a supply of clean water that is free of charge. I stand by this for several reasons.
It is understandable that a supply of water in every home could cost a handsome amount to the government. In cities with large population, the construction of pipes and the supply of clean water could take up a high percentage of the monthly budget.
Admittedly, there is also a potential risk of high water wastage. Considering the resources of our planet, water wastage is already one of the major issues. Even if awareness is spread and rules are made, a strict eye cannot be kept in this regard. For instance, in a home with high water usage, it cannot be told if clean water is used for drinking or cooking purposes or the water is wasted on washing dishes or doing laundary.
However, clean water remains a basic human necessity, especially in terms of health. A human body is made of 70% water. Intake of contaminated water can result in widespread diseases or potential pandemics in the country. Applying charges to clean water supply could lead to underpriviliged population avoiding safe drinkable water and choosing tap water which could hold traces of different elements like lead, which are not safe for humans. For example, in a small village named Dhano in Pakistan, people were caught by a disease called H Pylori, which continued for generations and a genetic mutation was observed.
Considering children and elderly, their immune systems are weaker than the rest. Exposure to water related diseases can result in high mortality rate and excessive hospital admissions. This would eventually cause an incline in usage of medicated drugs overall.
Moreover, the taxes paid by the people of the country are meant to be used for their betterment. Along with construction of roads, governmental service buildings, and other sites, basic necessities like access to clean water should be provided by the authorities. The tax money should be used to accommodate the residents of the country in regards to basic rights of the citizens.
In conclusion, access to clean drinkable water is a bsic human right. To avoid potential health risks and spread of diseases, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge, budgetting from the taxes collected by the governement.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Overall | 7.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0
You successfully address all parts of the task by presenting a clear position agreeing that water should be provided free of charge, and you support your arguments with relevant explanations and examples. Your opening paragraph clearly outlines your stance. You acknowledge counter-arguments regarding government costs and water wastage, which helps develop your ideas, before counter-balancing with strong points concerning public health, the needs of vulnerable populations, and the use of tax revenue. For instance, your example regarding the village of Dhano in Pakistan effectively illustrates the health risks of contaminated water. Your ideas are well-extended throughout, meeting the requirements of Band 7.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0
Your essay demonstrates a clear overall progression with a logical arrangement of ideas. Each paragraph has a distinct focus, transitioning from an introduction and counter-arguments to health implications, taxation arguments, and a concise conclusion. You make good use of cohesive devices such as 'Admittedly', 'However', and 'Moreover' to guide the reader through your arguments. Paragraphing is used appropriately to structure the response. However, occasional referencing or connective links feel slightly mechanical, preventing a higher band, but the logical flow remains clear and consistent throughout the text.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.5
You demonstrate a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow for some flexibility and precision, using less common items such as 'underprivileged', 'mutations', and 'mortality rate'. You also incorporate topic-specific terminology like 'contaminated water', 'immune systems', and 'public health'. There are a few spelling and word-choice errors, such as 'underpriviliged', 'laundary', 'budgetting' instead of 'budgeting', and 'governement', but these do not impede communication. With more careful proofreading of spelling and collocations, your lexical score would be higher.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms effectively, demonstrating control over relative clauses and conditional structures. Examples like 'In cities with large population, the construction of pipes and the supply of clean water could take up a high percentage' show an ability to construct varied sentences. There are a few minor grammatical errors and awkward phrasing, such as 'human body is made of 70% water' (missing article 'The') and 'a strict eye cannot be kept in this regard'. However, these errors do not impede communication, and there are many frequent error-free sentences, justifying a solid Band 6.5.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.