Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Availability to pure water is a vital necessity for human life. So, water supply should be free of cost for every house.

I strongly agree with this sentiments, because it is a truth universally actknowledged that no living being can survive without water. The purity of water is another significant factor in this respect. Despite its importance it is privilage to have an acess to clean water. Many people are deprived of this basic right.

Due to shortage of clean water people especially from marginalized areas suffer from fatal diseaes and conditions such as malaria which spreads due to mosquitos giving birth in contaminated water, hepatitis due to feacal contact with individuals, diarrhea due to impure water etc. This is mainly because of contaminated and dirty water.

It highlights how crucial clean water is for human beings. Alas! availability to clean water is short in urban areas while it is nowhere found in rural areas.Water is a basic property of life.

In conclusion, clean water is fundamental to human life and should be considered a free of charge right. It should be the priority of our government to provide people with clean and fresh water sources, both for rural and urban areas. The government should make water plants to provide to every home.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear position agreeing that clean water should be provided free of charge, supporting it with reasons relating to health risks like hepatitis and diarrhea. However, the essay falls significantly short of the required word count, containing only 213 words compared to the 250-word minimum. This results in under-developed ideas and an abrupt conclusion. While the main stance is communicated, the lack of length prevents a more thorough exploration of the arguments required for a higher band score.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay is organized into distinct paragraphs including an introduction, body paragraphs addressing health issues, and a brief conclusion. However, progression is somewhat disjointed. Sentences like 'Alas! availability to clean water is short...' disrupt the academic tone and logical flow. Cohesive devices are basic and sometimes mechanical. Paragraphing is present, but the overall structure feels fragmented due to the very short paragraphs and sudden transitions between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is generally basic and repetitive, with several spelling and word choice inaccuracies. For example, 'availability' is used instead of 'access' or 'availability of', 'sentiments' is used instead of 'sentiment', and there are spelling errors such as 'actknowledged' (acknowledged), 'privilage' (privilege), 'acess' (access), 'diseaes' (diseases), and 'feacal' (fecal). While the writer attempts some less common terms like 'marginalized areas' and 'contaminated', the high frequency of errors restricts the lexical score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but control is inconsistent. There are frequent grammatical errors, such as 'Availability to pure water is a vital necessity' and 'provide to every home'. Punctuation and article usage are also flawed in several places. Although the meaning is generally understandable despite these errors, the high density of mistakes in a short text prevents the assignment of a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.