Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Nowadays finding clean water is very difficult. So our government provide it for us. People think it should be free of charge but government think otherwise. So today we will talk about this debate in this essay. I am going to provide further information and my own opinion in further paragraphs.

We will first talk about water , yes it is basic human right . Our earth have large amount of water in the form of sea , rivers , canals and glaciers. When some people come to know that we have that much water they think that water should be free because we have enough water on earth. But when we examine that water we come to know that mostly earth water is salty and we can nit drink that . There is only a small amount of water we can drink. And now only small amount of water is left on earth for use. We noticed we can not drink any null water in the city because the water is not pure. We have to clean and purify first and then we should drink it.

This is the task our government is doing right now. They first collect good water then clean it purify it. They make sure that it is drinkable or not if it is ready they gave us that water. All this need labor. And government have to pay these labor and make machines for this system , so all this need money thats why they are charging us. Thats my personal opinion if they are charging us a little for clean water we should give them these charges. Because we are getting clean water supply in return.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing whether clean water should be provided free of charge, presenting a clear personal opinion in the final paragraph. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. For instance, the writer spends a significant portion of the text explaining that much of the earth's water is salty and needs purification, rather than fully developing arguments regarding the socio-economic implications of free public utilities versus state taxation. While the position is understandable, it tends to oversimplify complex arguments. Therefore, the response aligns best with Band 5.0, where ideas are somewhat limited and under-developed, and the task is addressed only partially in terms of depth and breadth.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay attempts some logical organization, but overall progression is hindered by choppy, repetitive sentence structures and very basic paragraphing. The introduction relies on conversational filler phrases like 'So today we will talk about this debate in this essay,' which detracts from formal academic cohesion. Cohesive devices are largely absent or repetitive; for example, the over-reliance on simple conjunctions ('And', 'So', 'But') creates a staccato rhythm rather than a smooth flow. Referencing is sometimes unclear, such as the sudden shift to discussing 'null water' in the second paragraph. Paragraphing is present, but the internal links between sentences require more sophisticated transitional markers. These features place the response firmly at Band 5.0.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, with frequent reliance on everyday words like 'water', 'clean', 'good', and 'make'. There are noticeable lexical errors and inappropriate word choices, such as 'nit' instead of 'not', 'earth water' instead of 'earth's water', and 'null water'. The writer attempts to introduce less common vocabulary like 'purify' and 'labor', but the range remains limited and minimally adequate for the task. Spelling and word-choice errors are frequent, occasionally causing slight strain for the reader, which corresponds to the characteristics of a Band 5.0 performance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The grammatical range is restricted. The response consists predominantly of simple sentences and very basic compound sentences (e.g., 'They first collect good water then clean it purify it.'). Attempts at complex structures are rare and frequently flawed, accompanied by significant punctuation and capitalization errors, such as missing apostrophes ('government have', 'thats') and incorrect comma splices. Grammatical errors are frequent throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ('our government provide', 'all this need labor') and missing articles. However, communication is not completely impeded, aligning the grammar score with Band 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.