Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Over the recent decades, government started initiatives for the betterment of society. Therefore, it is a basic right for humans to have a clean water at homes which should be free of cost. I agree with the given statement that regimes should start this so that everyone get benefit from it which I will discuss in the upcoming paragraphs.

To commence with, there are anormous benefits of it. First and the foremost one is, due to clear water people donot have much health issues. Drinking water is the basic necessity and people drink more than eat so if they drink polluted water, they can face more health issues which will affect their work. Moreover, there are some people who cannot afford mineral water and to establish water purifires at home because they are expensive so in these kind of conditions it help them alot.

Moving further to more advantages of this development. It is beneficial for both authorities and local individuals. To explain it more, government put limits on providing water to people so that they donot overuse this facility. As a result, it saves environment as well as this basic necessity will save for future generation. To add more, there are some areas where there are hurdles for individuals to have basic necessities for living. So , at there government inbuilted pipelines for clean water which help them in survival.

In conclusion, government this initiative help locals alot as it help them physically as well as emotionally. Moreover, it helps alot to poor people who cannot afford these basic necessities for living.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position agreeing that clean water should be provided free of charge, and presents several supporting arguments relating to health benefits and affordability for poorer households. However, the development of these ideas is limited and at times repetitive, which places the response firmly in the Band 5 category. While the writer attempts to explain the advantages of government intervention, the supporting examples are somewhat vague and lack deeper elaboration. For instance, the mention of health issues is brief and underdeveloped, and the reasoning surrounding government limits on water usage is somewhat confused. To reach a higher band, the writer needs to extend their ideas more fully with robust explanations and concrete examples rather than relying on generalized statements.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay displays a basic overall arrangement with clear paragraphing, including an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the progression of ideas is often disjointed, and cohesive devices are used mechanically or inaccurately. Phrases like 'To commence with', 'Moving further to more advantages', and 'To add more' feel formulaic and repetitive. Furthermore, referencing is frequently unclear, as seen in sentences like 'in these kind of conditions it help them alot', where the pronoun antecedent is ambiguous. Punctuation errors, such as the space before the comma in 'So , at there', also detract from the cohesion. While the text is generally navigable, the lack of smooth transitions and flexible cohesive devices keeps the score at Band 5.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is relatively basic and repetitive, representing a limited range that is minimally adequate for the task. Words such as 'benefits', 'issues', 'help', and 'people' are overused throughout the essay. There are also noticeable lexical errors and awkward word choices, such as 'enormous benefits', 'clear water' instead of 'clean water', 'establish water purifires' instead of 'install water purifiers', and 'government inbuilted pipelines'. Spelling errors like 'anormous' and 'purifires' occur, though they do not severely impede overall comprehension. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, but these attempts are often imprecise or grammatically incorrect. To improve, the writer should focus on expanding their lexical repertoire and learning precise collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple sentences and basic compound forms. Attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty, characterized by missing subjects, run-on structures, and awkward phrasing, such as 'so if they drink polluted water, they can face more health issues which will affect their work.' There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ('government started', 'everyone get benefit'), missing articles ('have a clean water'), and tense inconsistencies. Punctuation is also problematic in places. These frequent errors cause occasional difficulty for the reader, aligning the grammar with the Band 5 descriptors where frequent errors persist even in simpler structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.