Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In the modern world, clean water should be accessible to everyone irrespective of their status and background. It is a fundamental human right. Therefore, governments must ensure that they are providing adequate amount of water to every person and every household in their country. I believe that water should be provided for free upto a limit which is sufficient for basic human needs and upon that, it should be charged.

A normal human needs 1500 litres of water every month. In today's era of modern infrastructure, it is not very hard to provide clean water to each person. In my opinion, water is equally important to each person weather she is poor or she is rich. The mother nature has provided water to humans and hence, each individual should have a right to its access. Water is abundantly available in nature for each individual but sometime for individual greed, many people try to commoditize water even for a basic usecase and the government should ensure that it does not happen. Hence, the government should try to provide clean and drinkable water supply to every citizen without any charge upto a certain limit.

However, the water wastage is increasingly becoming a serious problem as the clean water sources are being overused by various people and industries. Which is creating the scarcity of clean water in may regions of the world. Therefore, I believe that the water usage should be charged after a particular limit of usage to make sure that it is not overused for unnecessary activities for personal leisure or commercial purposes. So based on the purpose behind the usage, it should be charged reasonably. For example, the Delhi Government had a very good wealfare scheme for water where 20,000 litres of water was provided free to each household in the state.

To conclude, the water is extremely fundamental to every living being and it should be avaialble for everyone without much restriction. However to prevent the overuse of it, there should be some measures such as pricing the water or extra charges for the unnecessary use.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The candidate addresses all parts of the task by taking a clear, nuanced position that water should be provided free up to a basic limit, with charges applied for excess consumption. The ideas are well developed and supported with a relevant example from the Delhi Government's welfare scheme. The position remains consistent throughout the response, and the arguments regarding both human rights and resource conservation are thoroughly explored. This fully satisfies the Band 7 and touches upon Band 8 descriptors for task achievement.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response features a clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct focus, moving smoothly from the initial premise to a discussion on basic needs, followed by the counter-argument regarding water wastage and pricing, and finally concluding with a neat summary. Cohesive devices such as 'Therefore', 'However', and 'To conclude' are used effectively to guide the reader. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, meeting the criteria for a solid Band 7.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The writer demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary for flexibility and precision, employing terms like 'commoditize', 'scarcity', and 'welfare scheme'. There are occasional lexical inaccuracies or awkward phrasings, such as 'weather she is poor' instead of 'whether' and 'mother nature' with an unnecessary article. However, less common items are attempted with adequate awareness of style and collocation, meaning communication is never impeded. These characteristics place the lexical performance firmly in the Band 6.5 to 7 range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The essay displays a good mix of simple and complex sentence forms. The writer successfully uses conditional and modal structures, such as 'governments must ensure that they are providing' and 'the water usage should be charged'. There are some grammatical errors and typos present, including spelling slips like 'upto', 'weather' instead of 'whether', and 'avaialble'. Furthermore, fragments like 'Which is creating the scarcity' demonstrate minor control issues with complex relative clauses. Despite these lapses, the majority of sentences are clear and do not impede comprehension, aligning well with Band 6.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.