Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Task - 2

In the modern era, water plays a crucial role in every person's life because the individuals contain 71% of water. Some people think that government should provide the water free of cost to people. I agree with this statement and reasons which will be elaborated in the upcoming paragraphs with relevant examples.

To Begin with, fundamental reasons should be considered why authorities provide the water supply free of cost. Primarily, it is basic need of individuals and it also reduce the discrimination between poor and rich. To explain it, if lawmaker provide the water to people they solve problem of human because individuals totally depend on the water. Having cooking, as an example. When people make a food they need water to as well as they become a hydrated and free forom hazardous disease like body infection. As a result, people fullfill their basic necessities with the help of water.

Furthermore, it helps to mitigates the a number problem. This point is substantiated by the fact that when people receive the water regularly,

they maintain the hygiene which is not only benefit for the individual's growth, but also reduce a numerous health problems. For example, a low income families have a only sufficient amount of money so, they can not pay a bill for water supply. As a consequence, people should use limited water and do not waste water. which is very useful for the future.

In conclusion, it provides a plethora of merits to individuals to maintain equality between rich and poor as well as it also improves the value of life and free from the serious disorders.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by clearly stating a position agreeing that water should be provided free of charge, and it presents relevant supporting ideas. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. For instance, the argument regarding reducing discrimination between the rich and the poor is introduced in the introduction and conclusion, but the body paragraphs focus more generally on basic needs and hygiene rather than explicitly expanding on socio-economic equity. The ideas are relevant and understandable, aligning best with a Band 5 or 6 descriptor, but due to some under-development and over-generalisation in the reasoning, a score of 5.5 is appropriate.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays an overall organization with clear paragraphing, including an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Transitional phrases such as 'To Begin with', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion' are used to structure the text, although some cohesive devices are mechanical or awkward, such as 'To explain it' and 'This point is substantiated by the fact that'. Referencing is sometimes unclear, particularly with pronoun usage like 'it' referring back to ambiguous subjects. Paragraph progression is generally evident, but the logical links between sentences occasionally falter, such as the abrupt shift regarding low-income families and water wastage. These features place the response firmly in the Band 5.5 to 6.0 range.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student attempts a range of vocabulary appropriate for the topic, including terms like 'fundamental reasons', 'mitigates', and 'hygiene'. However, there are frequent inappropriate word choices and collocations throughout the text, such as 'because the individuals contain 71% of water', 'free forom hazardous disease', and 'a only sufficient amount of money so, they can not pay a bill'. Spelling errors ('forom', 'fullfill') and grammatical word-class errors ('mitigates the a number problem') are noticeable and occasionally cause strain for the reader. The lexical range is limited but minimally adequate, fitting the Band 5 descriptors.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating relative clauses and conditional structures. However, grammatical accuracy is weak, with frequent errors in subject-verb agreement ('lawmaker provide'), missing articles ('is basic need'), incorrect prepositions, and punctuation errors. For example, sentences like 'When people make a food they need water to as well as they become a hydrated' contain structural breakdowns that impede smooth reading. While complex structures are attempted, they are frequently faulty. These persistent errors across most sentences reflect the Band 5 descriptor.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.