Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-29
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Humans should be free to access clean water, and the government should provide a water supply at no cost. I firmly agree on this because clean water is necessary for human health as well as other usage. An attempt will be made in this essay to examine both views carefully. From one perspective, cleanliness is the responsibility of every individual, and they are all free to get everything that is good for health. Water is a basic need of humans as well as animals. All organisms have the right to access clean water. Clean water without any bactaria is benificail for health. Doctors also recommend clean water for a healthy lifestyle. For instance, In the Holy Quran, God says that cleanliness is the half of faith. Moreover, for the supply of clean water our government has to take serious steps, and it should be avaible free of cost. From another perspective, if people get clean water, then they should be responsible for using it carefully and not waste it. They should not take advantage of it and waste it in useless activities. For example, Many people use clean water in swimming rather than in drinking or other basic purposes so it's not good. So, a water supply free of charge is the basic advantage if this is provided by the government but people should make accurate decisions for using it. In Conclusion, I believe that individuals should get clean water because this is the need of the hour additionally, this is mandatory for the development of a healthier society. However, it should be available to people without any expense. So, I completely agree with this view.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by clearly stating a position agreeing that clean water should be provided free of charge, and it supports this with reasons related to human health and societal development. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. For instance, the discussion on health relies heavily on general assertions rather than fully elaborated arguments, and the inclusion of a template-like phrase such as 'An attempt will be made in this essay to examine both views carefully' is unnecessary for a personal opinion essay. Furthermore, the counter-perspective regarding people wasting water is somewhat underdeveloped. Nonetheless, all parts of the task are addressed, earning a solid Band 6.0.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay has a recognizable overall structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used to separate different perspectives, although the body paragraphs tend to run together in terms of visual layout or logical flow. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'From one perspective', 'Moreover', and 'From another perspective', which help guide the reader through the text. However, referencing and transitions are sometimes mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'So, a water supply free of charge is the basic advantage if this is provided by the government'. Progression is present, but the logical links between sentences can feel disjointed at times. This performance aligns well with the Band 6 descriptor.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary range for the task, attempting some less common words and phrases such as 'mandatory', 'development of a healthier society', and 'basic need'. However, there are notable spelling errors ('bactaria' instead of bacteria, 'benificail' instead of beneficial, 'avaible' instead of available) and occasional inappropriate word choices or word forms. Despite these lexical slips, the errors do not impede communication, as the writer's meaning remains clear throughout the response. The range is minimally sufficient to convey the intended ideas, fitting the criteria for Band 6.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including conditional structures ('if people get clean water, then they should be responsible...') and relative clauses. There are, however, several grammatical errors and punctuation issues throughout the text, such as missing articles ('in swimming rather than in drinking'), awkward phrasing ('cleanliness is the half of faith'), and run-on structures. While these errors are noticeable and occur with some frequency, they rarely impede overall communication. The command of grammar shows a reasonable mix of structures but lacks the consistent control required for higher bands, making Band 6.0 appropriate.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.