Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-29
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is often argued that access to clean water is fundamental human right and that every houdehold should receive a basic water supply for free of cost. While some people agree with this view, I believe that water is essential for human survival, and making it accessible to everyone can improve public health and reduce poverty to a large extent.
The primary reason why I support this view is that water is essential for survival. In other words, every person needs clean water for drinking, cooking and washing purpose. For example, poor people may be forced to use the contaminated water, which can cause diseases such as cholera. As a result, the water is more necessary for mataining good health for every individual, making this argument highly convincing.
Another important reason is that, free water reduces the poverty and inequality of people. Furthurmore, Low-income families can save money on essential needs this could happen the people reduce the financial burden for poor peoples. For example this would promote equality and help families can use their savings for food ,education and healthcare in this situation they can use their money. Everyone gets equal acces to basic necessity by the government canmeet their basic needs.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that every household should receive a basic supply of clean water for free of charge. Because governments should implement the affordable water distribution system for all poor peoples to save money for their other essentials and can introduce free water for reducing poverty and inequality of people. Therefore, I believe that access to clean water is a basic human right.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses all parts of the task and presents a clear position throughout. The writer agrees that access to clean water is a basic human right and that it should be provided free of charge, supporting this with relevant ideas regarding survival, public health, and poverty reduction. The ideas are extended and supported, such as mentioning contaminated water causing diseases like cholera, though some parts suffer from slight repetition. Overall, the task is well addressed, satisfying the requirements for a Band 6.5 or 7.0, and fits comfortably into the Band 6 descriptor due to some under-development of secondary points.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction and conclusion, and distinct body paragraphs. Cohesive devices are used to signal logical relationships, such as 'The primary reason why', 'Another important reason is that', and 'In conclusion'. However, cohesion is occasionally faulty or mechanical, as seen in the slightly disjointed flow of the third paragraph ('Furthurmore, Low-income families can save money on essential needs this could happen the people reduce...'). Referencing is not always clear, but the progression remains sufficiently logical to follow, aligning well with the Band 6 descriptors.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The writer uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common items such as 'fundamental human right', 'contaminated water', and 'financial burden'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including typos ('houdehold' for household, 'Furthurmore'), grammatical collocation slips ('free of cost' instead of free of charge, though corrected later), and awkward phrasing like 'mataining good health' and 'equal acces'. These inaccuracies do not impede communication, placing the vocabulary firmly in the Band 6 category.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The response demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing relative clauses and conditional structures. However, there are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and article usage, such as 'is fundamental human right' (missing article), 'the water is more necessary for mataining' (unnecessary definite article and spelling error), and run-on structures like 'help families can use their savings for food ,education and healthcare in this situation they can use their money.' While these errors occur regularly, the meaning is generally clear and they rarely impede overall communication, which is characteristic of Band 6 performance.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.