Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
As a citizens of a nation, people should have an access to clean water as it is undoubtedly a basic human necessity. Every home should be provided with free water supply as their basic right. While i agree that governments should ensure that everyone has access to safe drinking water, I do not believe that unlimited water should be supplied free of cost to every house.
On the one hand, many people are still struggling to get proper access to drinking water. In Nepal, people are still facing lot of problems for getting water not only for drinking,but for all household purposes like cooking and maintaining personal hygiene. As a residents of nation, we pay taxes to government as our responsibility, but we are still lacking to get our basic rights to have safe water supply at our houses. In particular,low-income families may struggle to afford regular water bills, so a free minimum supply should prevent them from having to choose between water and other essential expenses. Moreover, ensuring universal access to safe water could reduce water-borne diseases and improve public health.
On the other hand, making the entire household water supply free could create several problems. Water treatment cost, transportation and maintainence require considerable finance resources. If the consumers do not pay anything, they may be less careful about water usuage which could lead to unnecessary water wastage and shortage. A basic approach could be to provide a certain quantity of water for free to every household while charging the minimal amount for consumption beyond that limit. This system would ensure that essentials need are met while encouraging people to use water in limit.
To sum up, I strongly believe that everyone should have free access to a sufficient amount of water because it is essential for human survival and its their basic right also. However, providing an unlimited water supply without charge is neither necessary nor essential. A basic free allowance with a charge beyond that limit is practical solution.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
The response effectively addresses all parts of the prompt by exploring both sides of the argument regarding free water supply. The writer adopts a clear and well-developed position right from the introduction, agreeing that access to safe water is a fundamental right and that a basic minimum should be free, but disagreeing with unlimited free supply. Ideas are extended and supported with relevant examples, such as the situation in Nepal, and practical solutions like a tiered charging system. The arguments are logical and well-reasoned, meeting the criteria for a Band 7.0.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay presents a clear logical organisation and progression throughout. The response is divided into logical paragraphs, with a distinct introduction, body paragraphs addressing opposing views, and a summary conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', 'Moreover', and 'To sum up' are used appropriately to guide the reader through the argument. However, referencing and paragraph transitions are sometimes slightly formulaic, preventing it from reaching the higher bands. Overall, cohesion is well managed, warranting a solid Band 7.0.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
The student demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary for the task with some flexibility and precision. Phrases like 'basic human necessity', 'universal access', 'water-borne diseases', and 'unnecessary water wastage' indicate a good control of topic-related terminology. There are occasional word choice and spelling inaccuracies, such as 'maintainence' instead of 'maintenance' and 'essentials need' instead of 'essential needs', but these errors do not impede communication. The use of less common items with general awareness of collocation aligns well with the Band 6.5 descriptors.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating an ability to construct subordinate clauses, conditional ideas, and relative structures (e.g., 'If the consumers do not pay anything, they may be less careful...'). There are several grammatical errors scattered throughout the text, including missing articles ('As a citizens', 'for getting water', 'as a residents of nation'), minor pluralisation errors ('in limit' instead of 'within limits'), and awkward phrasing ('we are still lacking to get'). Nonetheless, these errors rarely impede communication and the complex structures show decent control, supporting a Band 6.0 score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.