Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Clean water is an essential necessity for everyone, so it is argued that every household should be provided clean water with free water supply. I strongly disagree with this view because providing clean water to every household free of charge is not practical or sustainable.

To begin with, providing access to clean water is essential because it is necessary for maintaining good health and hygiene. Clean water is required for drinking, cooking, bathing, washing and other household tasks. Without access of clean water usually poor people use water from other sources that contain a large number of diseases. For example, in developing country low-income individuals may not be able to afford clean water than they use water from other sources like, rivers, and dirty wells that cause of digestion diseases. Therefore, governments should be ensure that to provide access of clean water to everyone espacially for low-income people.

On the other hand, I believe that this is not a positive aspect because in process of provide clean water to everyone have a large number of expenses like, draining, pipes cleaing, and heavy motors that supply clean water to every individual. Another significant factor is that, provided clean water to everyone without any charges could encourage people unnecessary consumption. For Instance, individuals during washing their cars left running taps that is unnacessary thing. Therfore, if a household paid a reasonable amount for their water supply they become more responsible to save their clean water.

In conclusion, although clean water is a basic human necessity and should be accessible to everyone, I do not believe that an unlimited water supply should be provided completely free of charge. Instead, governments should ensure that every household receives an affordable basic supply while charging for excessive consumption.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response clearly addresses both parts of the prompt by stating a firm position in the introduction and developing it throughout the body paragraphs. In the second paragraph, the writer acknowledges the importance of clean water for health and suggests that governments should assist low-income individuals. In the third paragraph, the counter-argument regarding infrastructure costs and excessive consumption is well explored with a concrete example of washing cars with running taps. The conclusion neatly ties the arguments together by proposing a compromise where a basic supply is affordable and excessive use is charged. Ideas are well supported and extended, fulfilling the criteria for Band 7.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay is clearly organised with a logical progression of ideas from introduction to body paragraphs and conclusion. Each paragraph has a clear central topic. Cohesive devices are used to guide the reader, such as 'To begin with', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion'. However, there are some minor mechanical or slightly awkward cohesive transitions, such as 'in process of provide clean water', which prevent this from reaching a higher band. Paragraphing is used appropriately and effectively throughout the response, ensuring a coherent overall arrangement that meets Band 7 requirements.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is generally adequate and appropriate for the task, demonstrating a sufficient range to discuss social and economic issues. The student attempts less common lexical items such as 'essential necessity', 'sustainable', 'unnecessary consumption', and 'excessive consumption'. However, there are several word choice, collocation, and form errors throughout the text, including 'access of clean water' instead of 'access to clean water', 'developing country' instead of 'developing countries', 'than they use' instead of 'then they use', and 'pipes cleaing' instead of 'pipe cleaning'. These occasional errors and awkward phrasings place the response firmly at Band 6.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including conditional or concessive clauses ('although clean water is a basic human necessity...'). There are, however, frequent grammatical errors and awkward phrasings, such as 'provided clean water to every household free of charge is not practical', 'governments should be ensure that to provide', 'in process of provide clean water to everyone have a large number of expenses', and 'if a household paid... they become'. While these errors do not impede communication because the writer's meaning remains clear, they occur with enough frequency to prevent the grammar score from reaching Band 7.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.